Aimpoint vs Eotech, yeah yeah yeah.

[wack8]

As everyone before me, I'm debating between an Aimpoint vs Eotech, and I've read all the comparisons, watched all the videos, garnered as much info without actually using either of the two as I can.

I know a lot of it comes down to personal preference, and possible experience with each of them (which I do not have). Not looking to start an Eotech vs Aimpoint battle here, but just looking for any input that covers things beyond what you typically find in the reviews and comparisons.

The main important points between the two that I've come up with:

Aimpoint:

• longer battery life and can have it always on
• less busy reticle
• maybe a little more durable
• people typically do lower 1/3 cowitness
• doesn't come with mount, but many options available

Eotech (mainly looking at the xps2):

• Shorter battery life, but uses readily available cr123
• Some love the 1moa + 65moa reticle
• Some say it has quicker target acquisition
• people typically do true center cowitness
• blocks a minimal amount of peripheral vision
• comes with mount

I don't care about NV, but I may possibly want to use a magnifier.


Does anyone know if there are ranges that have Aimpoints or Eotechs in stock that will let me test one out? If not, are there any kind members that would let me mount one on my gun to test (even if it means not shooting it, but just having it on there and pointing it around for a bit)?


Any other comments are welcome, and I'm sorry, I know many of you guys are probably sick of these comparison questions, but seems like everyone goes down this route once...



Thanks! P.S. I'm new here, feel free to come say hi over here at my 'new member sign in' - http://www.ar-15.co/forums/showthread.php?t=59858

[ray1970]

Not sure what your eyesight is like, but mine isn't the greatest. Not sure why, but the Eotech reticle gets blurry on me. The Aimpoint stays clear for me. For this main reason, I prefer the Aimpoints over the Eotech. The insane battery life of the Aimpoints is a big plus too.

You really can't go wrong with either though.

[Buckaroobonsai]

Eotech reticles are easier and quicker for me to acquire targets within CQB distances, but Aimpoints are easier to shoot at targets past 150 yards. Magnified, Eotechs work well at longer distances, but the extra weight sucks. Each has their strengths, but I'd rather have my ACOG that works well for both distances using the Bindon Aiming Concept, and requires no batteries.

http://www.ar-15.co/forums/showthread.php?t=56104

...and before anyone complains about the price, add up the cost of an Aimpoint red dot and 3x Magnifier with a decent mount, and you're in the same neighborhood. Quality costs more, but with optics, you get what you pay for.

[wack8]

I would love an acog, but I'm left eye dominant, right hand shooter, and both eyes open with any sort of zoom throws me off - but I can do it fine with a red dot. I'm not sure if I should just be a noob and close my left eye when using scopes, or if I should put in the years of practice, eye patches, etc to try and train my brain to handle both eyes open with a scope.

[cofi]

eotechs reliability is iffy....go aimpoint you wont be disappointed the m4 series uses a aa battery and has an 8 YEAR battary life

[Buckaroobonsai]

I can use one eye on the ACOG for longer distances, but both eyes for scanning, as the magnification is only evident when you stop.

I would love an acog, but I'm left eye dominant, right hand shooter, and both eyes open with any sort of zoom throws me off - but I can do it fine with a red dot. I'm not sure if I should just be a noob and close my left eye when using scopes, or if I should put in the years of practice, eye patches, etc to try and train my brain to handle both eyes open with a scope.

[Kaiser.Shooter]

eotechs reliability is iffy....go aimpoint you wont be disappointed the m4 series uses a aa battery and has an 8 YEAR battary life

I'm curious if anybody ever had a good working AA battery for 8 years...
when you buying a new batteries the package stamp shows expiration in about 4-5yrs. It seems like an aimpoint prolongs the battery life for another 3yrs,
so using aimpoint you recharge the battery, right?

[bogie]

Not sure what your eyesight is like, but mine isn't the greatest. Not sure why, but the Eotech reticle gets blurry on me. The Aimpoint stays clear for me. For this main reason, I prefer the Aimpoints over the Eotech except when I'm posing for my avatar. The insane battery life of the Aimpoints is a big plus too.

You really can't go wrong with either though.

Fixed

[ChunkyMonkey]

May I suggest... This!

[buckshotbarlow]

I used to be an eotech snob, then got a hellaofagud deal on a trijicon t32 or whatever the hell it is. Since then, trijicon optics are breading in the gun safe and the eotech's are getting a divorce...

Big advantage is the non use of batteries...I'm horrible with that crap and the cold weather where I hunt does not like batteries!!!