BUCK FARAK!!!

[rockymtnrifleman]

OMG... Ban "assault" weapons.... WTH?

An Armed Nation is a Peaceful Nation....

Thanks for driving up the future cost of shooting sports....

Banning firearms or classifications of firearms does not lead to less violence...

end of rant...

What do you guys think...?

[Bailey Guns]

If it saves just one child...

[spittoon]

he said if the are on the battlefield they do not belong here ,,... So all guns should be banned

[Tinelement]

I would ask him,

So, if more law abiding people had CCW, would we be talking about AWB??


I know it's been hashed here, would you shoot.......????? Not arguing it.

But if more of us had it, then maybe someone woulda. Just a thought. For the man. Something to think about. Not fast and furious. Just a thought. For him. Mr. Ofuckme. That's all. Just a thought.

[Bailey Guns]

I would ask him,

So, if more law abiding people had CCW, would we be talking about AWB??


I know it's been hashed here, would you shoot.......????? Not arguing it.

But if more of us had it, then maybe someone woulda. Just a thought. For the man. Something to think about. Not fast and furious. Just a thought. For him. Mr. Ofuckme. That's all. Just a thought.

OK...one of us has either had too much, or too little, alcohol. I have no freakin' clue what you're saying here.

[Great-Kazoo]

OK...one of us has either had too much, or too little, alcohol. I have no freakin' clue what you're saying here.

He is hypothetically asking if you would hand over OR choose Option B IF gun confiscation were to happen. OR since i do not drink COMPLETELY misinterpreting his post altogether.

[KestrelBike]

he said if the are on the battlefield they do not belong here ,,... So all guns should be banned

And in the same breath didn't he say he believed in the 2nd amendment? And didn't the Supreme Court, during his current term, confirm that the 2nd amendment is there to protect the right of the individual citizen against a tyrannical government??

Lying hypocritical piece of s*** needs to go

[Great-Kazoo]

And in the same breath didn't he say he believed in the 2nd amendment? And didn't the Supreme Court, during his current term, confirm that the 2nd amendment is there to protect the right of the individual citizen against a tyrannical government??

Lying hypocritical piece of s*** needs to go

The supreme court has nothing to do with any presidents sitting term. IT does however have sway over what remains or does not remain law. Which is why re-electing O will allow him to add 1 if not 2 judges to the SC.

[rockymtnrifleman]

GRR... It just urks me....

My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government.

Thomas Jefferson

Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny.
Thomas Jefferson

The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
Thomas Jefferson

ENOUGH SAID!!!

[Great-Kazoo]

Kind of late to the party.
http://www.ar-15.co/forums/showthread.php?t=68001

I don't think anything. .......................
I KNOW THIS [as i posted before]
ALL you board members voting on principle, when O selects a Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi or Barb Boxer mentality to the Supreme Court.
DON'T YOU EVER BITCH OR COMPLAIN ABOUT THE NEW RESTRICTIONS ON FIREARMS, OWNERSHIP AND OR POSSESSION OF, NEVER.
You deserve what your principle gave everyone.
Don't like Mittens?? neither do i. However his being elected has a more positive outcome for gun owners than O does being re-elected.