Close
Page 16 of 22 FirstFirst ... 61112131415161718192021 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 160 of 219
  1. #151
    Industry Partner BPTactical's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    North Metro
    Posts
    13,931

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Atrain1 View Post
    Do you think we will see 4 more years? Or will we give Romney a chance?
    Even when O went for cheap shots R did don't fall for them, he stayed on task and focused.
    Given the format for O to digress himself by the cheap shots and attempted humor was very poor strategy.
    This was a formal debate and as such proffesionalism, poise, demeanor and presentation are key, all while wearing many hats.

    Which one was more "Presidential"


    In all three debates I feel that Mittens has presented himself as a calm, sharp and cool proffesional who is well versed and understands the issues and priorities.
    The most important thing to be learned from those who demand "Equality For All" is that all are not equal...

    Gun Control - seeking a Hardware solution for a Software problem...

  2. #152
    BADGE BUNNY Monky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Englehood
    Posts
    5,447

    Default

    I voted today.. by mail in ballot.. I voted Romney/Ryan.. I'd rather see Oblowme out than anything else.

  3. #153
    Industry Partner BPTactical's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    North Metro
    Posts
    13,931

    Default

    Is that a he she in the discussion on Fox during Hannity?
    The most important thing to be learned from those who demand "Equality For All" is that all are not equal...

    Gun Control - seeking a Hardware solution for a Software problem...

  4. #154
    Zombie Slayer MrPrena's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Thornton
    Posts
    6,633

    Default

    Although i did t wathch them, it seem like both were cool.
    Obamas topic paragraph almost always started with attack.

    Obama seems to interrupt more than mitt did.

    Both showed little laughter.

    Deninitely want to see how undecided thought about it on major poll.

  5. #155
    Zombie Slayer Aloha_Shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Posts
    6,553

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rucker61 View Post
    We were about [yay] close to a financial depression. Did we spend too much? That's pretty likely. However, in January 2009, did we know how much was too little or too much? Nope, that was a pretty unique situation. I'd rather have erred on the side of too much than too little, because we've seen what a great depression looks like.
    First, the depth of the recession was heavily overstated. One of the things I blame Bush for was buying the Chicken Little stories about how close we were to collapse. The economy was in far worse shape during the Carter administration. Unlike the 1970s, we actually had some points of vibrancy 5 years ago and the areas that were weak (overextended housing market and risk-ridden financial sector) needed to collapse to find their bottoms. I understand the press conveniently forgetting that fact but have been dumbfounded that Republicans and conservatives didn't fight the malarkey.

    Second, yes, we DID know we were spending too much. Lots of financial analysts said we were spending too much; historical distance has shown us the Keynesian spending actually prolonged rather than relieved the Great Depression. Hell, lots of laymen knew we were spending too much on TARP.

    Further, the best thing we could have done for the financial industry AND the auto industry was let them declare bankruptcy. Too-big-to-fail was a Geithner-inspired load of crap bought by both administrations. You want someone to quit playing with fire? Let them feel the pain of the burn -- don't let them burn someone else instead like Corzine and JP Morgan did with the blessing of the Chicago Futures Market and the SEC.

    I understand you're liberal but at least do some research and thinking instead of mindlessly repeating the worn empty spin nuggets.

  6. #156
    Hatchet Sushi Master Rooskibar03's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Vail, AZ
    Posts
    2,774

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BPTactical View Post
    Is that a he she in the discussion on Fox during Hannity?
    Glad I wasnt the only one who spotted that obama shill. Pretty sure I saw an adams apple.

    That group is full of idiots tonight.
    Progressive ideology, ideas so good they must be mandatory.
    Your freedom to be you includes my freedom to be free from you.

  7. #157
    Zombie Slayer MrPrena's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Thornton
    Posts
    6,633

    Default

    Imho, I think obama s first debate changed his entire strategy of the 3. Debate.
    Romney needs to do what Romney need to do to win.
    Obama has to win what hr had to do, but I think obama s manager may have thought aggressiveness equals to win for Obama.
    So, Obama got aggressive and more aggressive over debates.

  8. #158
    Hatchet Sushi Master Rooskibar03's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Vail, AZ
    Posts
    2,774

    Default

    Hey chuckle head behind Sean Hannity on live national TV, HANG UP YOUR PHONE.

    You look like an idiot.
    Progressive ideology, ideas so good they must be mandatory.
    Your freedom to be you includes my freedom to be free from you.

  9. #159
    Ammocurious Rucker61's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO, USA
    Posts
    3,359

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aloha_Shooter View Post
    First, the depth of the recession was heavily overstated. One of the things I blame Bush for was buying the Chicken Little stories about how close we were to collapse. The economy was in far worse shape during the Carter administration.
    I understand you're liberal but at least do some research and thinking instead of mindlessly repeating the worn empty spin nuggets.
    Cite?

  10. #160
    WONT PAY DEBTS
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    1,639

    Default

    I am behind the Mitt. I admit that prior to the debates I was lukewarm on him. Kind of thought he was a candy-ass and a little too moderate. After the first debate that changed.

    What I see.hear from Mittens-

    Yeah, I know how to get things done, and sometimes that means compromise, I had 70% Democrat State Senate to deal with, and I got shit done.
    The economy is where my focus is, I know how to fix it and I will get it done
    I dont favor more government involvement than necessary. Get the Fed out of the State medicare and school administration, no new Federal gun laws, reduced Fed regulatory programs, put that burden on the state and local governments because they do a better job of it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •