You are so full of shit.
The tax base is in the high rent districts. Of course the financial centers take in more taxes than the deep south. Of course the poverty level there is lower and folks tend to be non-filers or get refunds.
Libs like to manufacture the numbers to work in their favor by touting Fed outlays compared to state input. That includes all programs - roads, bridges, military bases, etc. and overlooks the fact that many deep south "red" states have less educated populations making less money, thereby paying less into the system. The data is oft repeated on many, many Lib sites.
How about we talk about the takers, the moochers, the leeches of our hard earned tax dollars? 4.5M on welfare.
This shows a representative mix but the data is old. http://www.statemaster.com/graph/eco...tal-recipients
This is more current data. http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofa/...11-07-tanssp-0
Caseload data top takers:
#1 California
#2 New York
#3 Ohio
#4 Michigan
#5 Tennessee
#6 Pennsylvania
#7 Washington
#8 Texas
#9 Massachusetts
#10 Florida
This one includes food stamp recipients. Barring Texas, which has very low welfare takers, The big moochers are Blue states. http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2...are-table.html
Where's the largest population of assistance recipients?
#1 California
#2 New York
#3 Pennsylvania
#4 Michigan
#5 Ohio
How about Food stamps?
#1 Texas*
#2 California
#3 New York
#4 Florida
#5 Illinois
#6 Michigan
#7 Pennsylvania
#8 Ohio
* Texas has a low welfare handout. That tells me there are hard working people barely scraping by but needing assistance, but at least they are working and not sitting on their ass eating bon bons.
As a fair comparison, the top 10 states by income to the Fed:
1 California
2 New York
3 Texas
4 Florida
5 Illinois
6 New Jersey
7 Pennsylvania
8 Ohio
9 Minnesota
10 North Carolina
Just the facts man, just the facts. I get mine from published government or non-biased media reports.







Reply With Quote
