My Feedback
"When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law." -Frederic Bastiat
"I am a conservative. Quite possibly I am on the losing side; often I think so. Yet, out of a curious perversity I had rather lose with Socrates, let us say, than win with Lenin."
― Russell Kirk, Author of The Conservative Mind
This is an absolute fact, in my opinion. A lot of you guys think Romney wasn't conservative enough. You've just witnessed the movement of the republican party even further to the left. And if you thought 3rd party candidates were irrelevant before, you ain't seen nothing yet.
3rd party candidates will just become a novelty now. Conservative Americans are a minority. There aren't enough to overcome the liberals (more specifically, those that will vote for dems/libs) and their numbers are just going to grow.
Stella - my best girl ever.
11/04/1994 - 12/23/2010
Don't wanna get shot by the police?
"Stop Resisting Arrest!"
Being a crook and being a member of a church aren't really exclusive, you know...
Gary Johnson took 1% of the vote. With no media exposure, being barred from the debates, nothing. And, like you said, the GOP is moving. I don't think it's left, though. They are getting too far fringe. Maybe people want fiscal conservative beliefs, but they don't feel that religious morals from a religion they aren't a part of should dictate how they live their lives? Eventually the GOP is going to go too far, and there will be a sizable enough gap in representation for a third party candidate to rise as a viable alternative.
The past two election cycles the GOP nominated McCain and Romney, neither of which were "fringe", neither of which were right wing at all.
So why do you write the comment above that makes it appear you have no clue what McCain or Romney were about as candidates?
By the way, Obama barely won in actuality. He lost 10 million of his '08 voters. If Romney had kept all the McCain 08 voters, he would have won.
Sayonara
What does it say about the GOP's candidates that, despite Obama's shitty job the past 4 years, he still beat them?
Obama has done nothing in his life BUT prey on and take advantage of people's emotions. He's good at it. I am no fan of McCain's but the man had an impossible job in 2008 -- there was no way any Republican was going to beat him. This past year, Obama had all the normal advantages of being an incumbent (there ARE advantages despite his horrible performance), media coverage that might as well been part of his paid PR team and luck in how two hurricanes came through: one that cut short and diverted attention from the GOP convention and one that gave him a chance to look presidential just before the actual election.
The GOP would have done well to have had ground game set up for the past 3 years like Obama did and hammered his unpresidential performance all year, crafting messages for his base, but I wouldn't say this loss says something about the GOP's candidates.
My Feedback
"When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law." -Frederic Bastiat
"I am a conservative. Quite possibly I am on the losing side; often I think so. Yet, out of a curious perversity I had rather lose with Socrates, let us say, than win with Lenin."
― Russell Kirk, Author of The Conservative Mind