Quote Originally Posted by SA Friday View Post
No. They just need to be more flexible than you are currently displaying. Taking a zealotry stance on every issue instead of prioritizing core theology over tertiary issues is exactly what I'm talking about.
What "zealotry stance", what "prioritizing core theology"?

Republicans have publicly not given two shits about Abortion for the better part of the last decade or two, but Democrats keep bringing it up (and lying about it ... telling women that Republicans want them barefoot and pregnant).

Hell, the GOP could change their platform demanding zero restrictions on abortion AND government pay for it and the Dems would STILL get stupid women to vote against them because "the Republicans want you barefoot and pregnant".

The problem isn't really with the GOP, the problem is that the media is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Democrat party ... and they will continue to lie about Republicans no matter what they believe.

Hell, I think the problem is that the GOP keeps putting up mealy mouthed moderates like Romney and thus not giving people a CLEAR choice between D and R (its just D and D-Lite).

Frankly if the ticket had been Ryan-Rubio they would have done better (unless Obama's victory is due to cheating ... and since they're now claiming that voter turnout was significantly less than 2008 I have to wonder where all those extra votes went).

[MOD: These types of comments can not and will not be tolerated here on this site. While it may some day come down to such behavior, we will not advocate for it. If you truly feel this is the only path forward then perhaps you aren't a good fit here on the site anymore.]