Close
Page 7 of 10 FirstFirst ... 2345678910 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 99
  1. #61
    Hot for Susie TDYRanger's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Thornton
    Posts
    745

    Default

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History...es_public_debt

    If you scroll down the historical debt levels it gives you a good idea of the debt increases since just after the civil war. The debt to GDP ratio is pretty telling
    SUA SPONTE

  2. #62
    At least my tag is unmolested
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    CANON CITY, CO
    Posts
    3,133

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nynco View Post
    So in your libertarian deregulation model... what laws are there to stop wealth and corportations in particular from BUYING our elected officials if your same model says that money is free speech and corporations have the same rights as living citizens and you can give as much money as you want to an elected official? Nothing.... and that thing always leads to the corruption that you are crying about.

    You want to read up on a good essay that debunks most of the libertarian garbage have at it.
    http://www.zompist.com/libertos.html
    You don't even know what libertarian philosphy is, but you are content to use it as an epithet. In a libertarian economic model, there is little danger of "buying" an elected official because the libertarians don't give the government the power to do anything.

    Your opinions seem firmly grounded upon your ignorance.
    Sayonara

  3. #63
    The Bullet Button of Gun Owners nynco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Thornton
    Posts
    1,793

    Default

    Ah so in your model the gov has no ability to do anything. Like regulate those things I was talking about to keep them from bribing and buying our gov. Thanks for proving my point for me. You just invalidated your own argument even if you don't understand how.

  4. #64
    Took Advantage of Lifes Mulligan Pancho Villa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Centennial, CO
    Posts
    867

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nynco View Post
    Ah so in your model the gov has no ability to do anything. Like regulate those things I was talking about to keep them from bribing and buying our gov. Thanks for proving my point for me. You just invalidated your own argument even if you don't understand how.
    Ahh, actually, you proved my point for me. You just invalidated your own argument, even if you don't understand how.

    I'm going to be smug and bask in my victory.

  5. #65
    The Bullet Button of Gun Owners nynco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Thornton
    Posts
    1,793

    Default

    Go on explain yourself rather than doing a kid dance based on your opinion. The only thing you said was "I know you are but what am I" hardly a winning argument.

  6. #66
    At least my tag is unmolested
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    CANON CITY, CO
    Posts
    3,133

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nynco View Post
    Ah so in your model the gov has no ability to do anything. Like regulate those things I was talking about to keep them from bribing and buying our gov. Thanks for proving my point for me. You just invalidated your own argument even if you don't understand how.
    Another comment where you show your ignorance.

    First, I'm not a libertarian. Its not "my" model. My comments were illustrating how you are making comments about libertarian economic models that bear absolutely no relationship to actual libertarian philosophy. None. Your "refutations" of the libertarian model are to make up nonsense about what it states, and then triumphantly proclaim how wrong your fabrications are.

    It would seem obvious that if government was not allowed to act outside of a small sphere, it would be meaningless to "bribe" its officials for results outside that sphere. (Meanwhile increased regulations in the real world are increasing the influence of big corporations and increasing the amount of crony capitalism).

    So your belief that my comments - which you can't seem to understand at all - prove your point is just so absolutely ridiculous that I wonder how it is that you can be so confused about basics.
    Sayonara

  7. #67
    The Bullet Button of Gun Owners nynco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Thornton
    Posts
    1,793

    Default

    Even when gov was much smaller back in the 1800s corruption was a big problem. Its laughable to think that if you shrank gov small enough that corruption mean nothing. That is historically false.

    Now if we had regulations that made it so that people could not buy or bribe our gov and punishments that put people in jail for a long time who did so, that might go a long way in fixing this mess. But as I said you and admitted, you do want regulations.

    So about who is being ridiculous now?

  8. #68
    Took Advantage of Lifes Mulligan Pancho Villa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Centennial, CO
    Posts
    867

    Default

    No regulations + strong tort law solves most problems without the dead weight of giant regulatory agencies.

  9. #69
    The Bullet Button of Gun Owners nynco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Thornton
    Posts
    1,793

    Default

    What? what do you think tort law is?

  10. #70
    CO-AR's Secret Jedi roberth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Elk City, Oklahoma
    Posts
    10,501

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pancho Villa View Post
    No regulations + strong tort law solves most problems without the dead weight of giant regulatory agencies.
    I like that idea. Government will do its job in the court of law, not in an office with some bozo shitstain from the EPA.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •