One would think that there would be a protocol in place to ensure the shoot house was clear of friendlies before any live fire exercise began. Were they ignored or circumvented?
One would think that there would be a protocol in place to ensure the shoot house was clear of friendlies before any live fire exercise began. Were they ignored or circumvented?
Light a fire for a man, and he'll be warm for a day, light a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life...
Discussion is an exchange of intelligence. Argument is an exchange of
ignorance. Ever found a liberal that you can have a discussion with?
Everyone should have been accounted for outside the place each time before someone entered with a loaded weapon. Since this is training the place should have been called out "Hot" before they moved in.One would think that there would be a protocol in place to ensure the shoot house was clear of friendlies before any live fire exercise began. Were they ignored or circumvented?
Almost sounds like there were two groups and one did not know what the other was doing.![]()
![]()
I see you running, tell me what your running from
Nobody's coming, what ya do that was so wrong.
Frankly I'm surprised it's taken this long for someone from the "throw the loaded AK downrange to show how reliable it is" crowd to accidentally shoot someone. That dude (and frankly, any soviet/eastern european SOF guys that I've been around) had no business teaching CQB.
Want to learn how to get the shit kicked out of you? Russian and Eastern European SOF guys have that down. Those are some hard, hard dudes.
Want to learn tactical and technical proficiency? Seek instruction from someone who served in a unit that emphasizes those traits.
Hence my point about vetting your instructor. Just because someone was a Marine/SEAL/SWAT/SF/Etc. doesn't mean they actually understand the concepts behind what they did. It sure as hell doesn't mean they should be teaching it.
Mick-Boy
"Men who carry rifles for a living do not seek reward outside the guild. The most cherished gift...is a nod from his peers."
nsrconsulting.net
Jerrymrc is absolutely correct.
Live fire shoot house evolutions are an invaluable training tool. They also carry with them their own safety issues. There are ways to mitigate these issues (Jerrymrc covered the obvious) which were clearly being ignored in this instance.
CQB is not a flat range with walls and a roof. If you treat it that way, sooner or later someone is going to get hurt.
Mick-Boy
"Men who carry rifles for a living do not seek reward outside the guild. The most cherished gift...is a nod from his peers."
nsrconsulting.net
I've heard some CRAZY stories about how they used to train Spetsnaz soldiers. Shit that would get US instructors thrown in prison for life if they even went half that far in a training exercise: Setting the obstacle course on fire, locking troops in rooms with attack dogs, balancing armed grenades on troop's helmets. That is a whole new level of crazy.
Well lets not forget that the pistol jockey pulled the trigger three times and scored three hits on a live target. AND according to the above, he KNEW they were there as he set it up, so WTF was going through his mind that he lets three rounds off?
My Feedback
Credit TFOGGER : Liberals only want things to be "fair and just" if it benefits them.
Credit Zundfolge: The left only supports two "rights"; Buggery and Infanticide.
Credit roberth: List of things Government does best; 1. Steal your money 2. Steal your time 3. Waste the money they stole from you. 4. Waste your time making you ask permission for things you have a natural right to own. "Anyone that thinks the communists won't turn off your power for being on COAR15 is a fucking moron."
Did someone seriously just say anyone can make a mistake in regards to firearms? GTFO! This type of behavior is unacceptable with the topic of firearms.
I'm not fat, I'm tactically padded.
Tactical Commander - Fast Action Response Team (F.A.R.T.)
For my feedback Click Here.
Click: For anyone with a dog or pets, please read