Close
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 43
  1. #21
    I'm a dude, I swear! SuperiorDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    CCC / Golden
    Posts
    3,070

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sawin View Post
    HAHA I didn't the first time, but went back and finished it just now. Hilarious! Judge Judy is right. "$70,000 right down the sewer!" The plaintiff was just as big of a crook too. WTF?!?
    Yea, she wanted his free money too. Greed at it's finest.

  2. #22
    The Bullet Button of Gun Owners nynco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Thornton
    Posts
    1,793

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SuperiorDG View Post
    For those that watched until the end, did you notice the plaintive didn't pay rent either?
    I noticed that and was pretty disappointing that the judge let her emotions taint her court room ruling. The girl could have had a legitimate case against that guy. Here is how. If she and that idiot got a house together and he agreed to pay half the rent. What happens when he does not. Perhaps the girl did not have the money to cover the mooch. She then gets thrown out and the landlord sues her for back rent. She then sues the guy to get the money that he was supposed to use for rent. So she may not be as worthless as he is. We will never know because the judge lost her head.

  3. #23
    Angels rejoice when BigBears trumpet blows
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    CoS
    Posts
    5,249

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nynco View Post
    I noticed that and was pretty disappointing that the judge let her emotions taint her court room ruling. The girl could have had a legitimate case against that guy. Here is how. If she and that idiot got a house together and he agreed to pay half the rent. What happens when he does not. Perhaps the girl did not have the money to cover the mooch. She then gets thrown out and the landlord sues her for back rent. She then sues the guy to get the money that he was supposed to use for rent. So she may not be as worthless as he is. We will never know because the judge lost her head.
    Dude, the judge asked if she paid rent. She said "No". End of case. If there were extenuating circumstances for that answer, then they would've been filed in the brief and the judge would've let her explain that. Obvisouly there was no excuse. The judge is briefed before the trial starts. The judge did not lose her head. She was sick of the morass and dismissed the case. Plantiff and Defendant are both useless moochers of society.

  4. #24
    High Power Shooter
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Weld County Resident
    Posts
    954

    Default

    I love Judge Judy. Someone should shoot those two.

  5. #25
    The Bullet Button of Gun Owners nynco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Thornton
    Posts
    1,793

    Default

    Listen to what I am saying here. Yes she did not pay rent. The judge never asked why? If that is because the guy was supposed to pay half or all and she is now being sued by the landlord then there is a case for her to take against him so that she can then use that money to pay the landlord the settlement she owes. Like I said the Judge lost her head and dropped the ball. Or she could just be a worthless turd too I don't know. Just playin devils advocated.

  6. #26
    Angels rejoice when BigBears trumpet blows
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    CoS
    Posts
    5,249

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nynco View Post
    Listen to what I am saying here. Yes she did not pay rent. The judge never asked why? If that is because the guy was supposed to pay half or all and she is now being sued by the landlord then there is a case for her to take against him so that she can then use that money to pay the landlord the settlement she owes. Like I said the Judge lost her head and dropped the ball. Or she could just be a worthless turd too I don't know. Just playin devils advocated.
    I heard what you said friend. Please read what I wrote again. All the details are filed in the brief. Once the Plaintiff answered "no" and did not have any excuse as per the filed brief, there was no reason for the judge to ask "why". No reason to continue the case. There is no "why" to answer. (outside of being lazy or her using that money for something else, etc which none is covered under the law) You can find the whole episode online that will help fill in some of your other blanks and the contingencies of the case for you as well. Hope that helped.

    IF there WAS an excuse that she did not put in the brief... sorry, she can retry in another case as long as it fits certain criteria etc... which I'm not sure small claims, civil court will actually allow. Gotta read the paper work you fill out. Ignorance is no excuse.

  7. #27
    Varmiteer two shoes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    705

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nynco View Post
    Listen to what I am saying here. Yes she did not pay rent. The judge never asked why? If that is because the guy was supposed to pay half or all and she is now being sued by the landlord then there is a case for her to take against him so that she can then use that money to pay the landlord the settlement she owes. Like I said the Judge lost her head and dropped the ball. Or she could just be a worthless turd too I don't know. Just playin devils advocated.
    I hear what you are saying, but still disagree. If the plaintiff had said, "Your honor, I was only able to pay my half of the rent for the month of X, Y & Z" That would have been different. It is only now that the landlord is coming after her, that she sues him... She was content to pay and felt she owed nothing until after the fact. I do not readily agree with the Judge's ruling, but can see her disgust in what the "system" has brought her.
    -two shoes
    _____________________________________________
    The Food Stamp Program, administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, is proud to be distributing the greatest amount of free meals and food stamps ever. Meanwhile, the National Park Service, administered by the U.S. Department of the Interior, asks us to ‘Please Do Not Feed the Animals'. Their stated reason for the policy is because the animals will grow dependent on handouts and will not learn to take care of themselves.

  8. #28
    The Bullet Button of Gun Owners nynco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Thornton
    Posts
    1,793

    Default

    Well I might have a lot to learn about courts. I just look at TV courts as clown court. So who knows if there is even a brief.

    And yes it did help. Not that she matters, but I try to learn anytime I can and hopefully never need to apply such lessons in life.

  9. #29
    Rebuilt from Salvage TFOGGER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    7,788

    Default

    She paid no rent, and continued to live there for several months, now she is trying to recover money from her deadbeat roommate that she isn't actually out, so she can cover her own deadbeat ass.
    Light a fire for a man, and he'll be warm for a day, light a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life...

    Discussion is an exchange of intelligence. Argument is an exchange of
    ignorance. Ever found a liberal that you can have a discussion with?

  10. #30
    Grand Master Know It All Sawin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    144th & I25
    Posts
    3,936

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TFOGGER View Post
    She paid no rent, and continued to live there for several months, now she is trying to recover money from her deadbeat roommate that she isn't actually out, so she can cover her own deadbeat ass.
    ^precisely.
    Please leave any relevant feedback here:
    Sawin - Feedback thread.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •