
Originally Posted by
Singlestack
On other thing bothers me about gos' post: the word "right" Liberals just love to talk about "rights", whether it is an imagined "right to free healthcare" or Sandra Fluke's "right to taxpayer-funded contraception". Where do "rights" come from? Is a "right" a "right" because I say so, because a law says so, or because of some higher-level construct like the Bill of Rights or the Constitution?
In a free society, who or what limits our "rights"? Who or what says "businesses do not have an automatic right to be profitable"? I can find no such language in the Bill of Rights or Constitution, or in any local, state, or federal laws I'm aware of. In fact, the "right to pursue happiness" can absolutely be reasoned to include a right to have a profitable business - since this allows me to better provide for myself and my family - and therefore to "pursue happiness". Yes, prosperity and security most definitely make me happy.
So I challenge Mr gos and the other liberals/socialist/marxists here who subscribe to the notion "businesses do not have an automatic right to be profitable" to step forward and state what authority they have for making such a statement in our founding documents or laws, and clarify if that is just their personal opinion and otherwise unfounded/unsupported. If all they have is their opinion, then I totally reject their suppression of my freedom and right to pursue happiness.
Singlestack