Arizona gun store won't sell to Obama voters

[Ronin13]

He has the right to do business as he pleases, but I think it is counter productive to gun rights.

Says the guy who votes for the party that has been sooo good to gun rights in the past.... /sarcasm.

[MATT02GT]

He probably got more busniess from all the anti Obama people than he lost from the pro crowd

[Gunner]

How can you find out who a person voted for

[BlasterBob]

How can you find out who a person voted for

Just ask em. Chances are if they are Democraps, they will say whatever will make them look good.

[Great-Kazoo]

How can you find out who a person voted for

Usually they pop up here and there, in the GD section of most gun related web sites. They will tout that O will never take away guns, how we should share everything with those who never worked or do not deserve it. Argue and type away like a hysterical teenage girl, then stomp their feet when EVERYONE disagrees with them and their superior attitude.
Watch, wait for it.........................................

[USAFGopherMike]

Usually they pop up here and there, in the GD section of most gun related web sites. They will tout that O will never take away guns, how we should share everything with those who never worked or do not deserve it. Argue and type away like a hysterical teenage girl, then stomp their feet when EVERYONE disagrees with them and their superior attitude.
Watch, wait for it.........................................

^ Sad, but true. If I were the owner of a gun store, I wouldn't sell to them either.

[Bailey Guns]

I don't think it makes any difference. He's not going to alienate the people that won't shop there anyway and he's going to strengthen his standing with the pro-gun/anti-Obama crowd. Good for him for putting his money where his mouth is.

[theGinsue]

Why not sell to them in hopes that they become more knowledgeable about shooting sports and change their likely negative opinion of firearms....presumably anything is possible. The common gun forum mantra seems to be "take a new person to the range, get them interested in it", or "get the next generation interested in firearms to preserve the future of the 2A" and yet this businessman seems to be divisive about the very thing many of us would benefit from making inclusive.

It's surely his right to do it, just like it's his right to shoot himself in the foot. I simply think he may be accomplishing both tasks simultaneously.

Just because a tick prefers your purebred instead of a mongrel stray doesn't make it any less of a tick. Unless people are made to see the error of their ways, they will continue to make the same foolish decisions which adversely effect us all - and will ultimately cause the end of our 2A rights. I say "good for him" about this gun store owner. Besides, do you really want the left armed up when all hell breaks loose?

[Ashton]

Fact is you can't legally find out who someone voted for. If he asked me who I voted for I'd say neither of the two evils. If he didn't take my currency for a advertised asking price I'd sue. Plain and simple.

[TFOGGER]

Fact is you can't legally find out who someone voted for. If he asked me who I voted for I'd say neither of the two evils. If he didn't take my currency for a advertised asking price I'd sue. Plain and simple.

"We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone". Case dismissed.