Watched fox news a few minutes ago. Focus was on a press conference with Jay Carney, who said Beeho wants to get the tax increases approved now, but defer discussion on spending cuts and entitlement reform next year "since they are such complex topics". This explains the lack of a dem plan for spending cuts/entitlement reform. Pretty darn clear they have no intention of doing either - this is a repeat of the (successful) strategy used in the Reagan and Bush I administrations, when the Republicans caved on near-term tax increases in return for future spending cuts that never happened. Sadly, I fear this might actually succeed, as Boehner seems to want to not be blamed, although he will no matter what he does.
Peter Schiff's take is not only should we not avoid going over the fiscal cliff through sequestration, but in fact it is necessary to get any sort of meaningful spending cuts in the near term. Schiff is one of the very few who accurately predicted both the tech bubbles and housing bubbles bursting. He acknowledges there will definitely be pain, but the pain will be much worse if we don't make the cuts at all. http://www.europac.net/media/video_blog
I'm really not surprised about this - Beeho is pure politics, all the time - and his victory is when republicans get blamed for anything. My sense is sequestration won't happen and some sort of deal will be struck - but the deal will most definitely not be good for us.
Singlestack



Reply With Quote

