If I can find one in my price range before Christmas, I've decided it's time to get a Colt. I like my Ruger SA revolvers, the things are beasts, but they just aren't the same as the real thing.
I plan on this being a shooter not a safe queen so I'm not really concerned about finding a Gen2 and certainly not a Gen1. But I do have a question if anyone is knowledgeable about them -
If I'm not worried about collector status & resale value, is there any reason to stick with Colt rather than a cheaper Uberti or ... uh, that other company? Not USFA, they lost their minds with this Zip thing and their SAA wasn't all that much cheaper than a Colt anyway. Do the clones have problems with quality, reliability, triggers, timing, etc?
I'd love to save $500 and get something that's as good or better, but while I think Colt charges extra for their name I'm not sure that's all there is to the higher price. I might blindly pay a bit more for a Colt 1911, and I'm prepared to pay a lot more for a Colt SAA, but does it make any sense at all?
Looking for a P1650, by the way. I prefer the 5.5" barrel and I'd rather shoot .38 than .45LC at these prices. Besides, while Ruger can absorb any punishment a .45 can dish out, I want a real SAA and they look kind of delicate next to a Blackhawk or Vaquero
And if anyone knows THE place to shop for these things in NW Den/metro area, I'd appreciate that as well. Seems everyplace I go lately is focusing more on AR's + Sig, Glock, HK, etc.
Thanks
It may be obvious to some that I have no idea what I'm talking about as far as the Colt is concerned. Maybe they're just as tough as those old Rugers that outweigh a varmint rifle, but that's why I'm asking.



Reply With Quote

