An excellent argument against the anti's!

[Ronin13]

So I've been reading a lot lately about the Pro-2A backlash against that limey idiot, Piers Morgan, and his retarded Twitter gaff the other day:

Yes, he really is that dumb... but furthermore, he talks about how in the historical context that the 2nd only applies to muskets and that the framers of the constitution didn't consider technological advances. So then can we apply that logic to the 1st amendment? If the 2nd only covers muskets, then the 1st, using that logic, only applies to speaking publicly (without a microphone or megaphone), and quill and ink written documents, and doesn't cover TV, radio, printer press, laser printed, computer, and mobile or telephone communication... Now do you see how absolutely stupid that sounds. I suggest applying this same "historical" logic to any anti's you encounter who use the same.