Close
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Results 41 to 44 of 44
  1. #41
    Fleeing Idaho to get IKEA Bailey Guns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    SE Oklahoma
    Posts
    16,474
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    This will promptly be overturned by the "new" SCOTUS after Obama gets to appoint a couple more very liberal justices. I wouldn't get too excited about this.
    Stella - my best girl ever.
    11/04/1994 - 12/23/2010



    Don't wanna get shot by the police?
    "Stop Resisting Arrest!"


  2. #42
    IN MEMORIUM
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    The RUST Belt (Peoria, Illinois)
    Posts
    7,319

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TFOGGER View Post
    the "CH" is pronounced as "SH", thus it becomes Shittown...entirely appropos...
    You beat me to calling it Shittown. I lived and worked there long enought to realize exactly how that shitty city operates. Money will by ANYTHING there.

  3. #43
    Guest
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    North Denver area,Colorado
    Posts
    525

    Default

    In this case, it's "..shall not be infringed."

    However, none of this applied to state action until the passage of the 14th Amendment. There was actually a SCOTUS case from 1830 or so, over some Baltimore city ordinance or another, which held that the BoR only restrained the Federal government.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ronin13 View Post
    Oh my bad- It's "Congress shall make no law..."

  4. #44
    Grand Master Know It All Sharpienads's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    3,403

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by centrarchidae View Post
    In this case, it's "..shall not be infringed."

    However, none of this applied to state action until the passage of the 14th Amendment. There was actually a SCOTUS case from 1830 or so, over some Baltimore city ordinance or another, which held that the BoR only restrained the Federal government.
    You would be talking about Barron v City of Baltimore, in which Chief Justice Marshall delivered the majority opinion and stated that the Fifth Amendment did not apply to the states, but to the central government only.

    ...the fifth amendment must be understood as restraining the power of the general government, not as applicable to the states. In their several constitutions, they have imposed such restrictions on their respective governments, as their own wisdom suggested; such as they deemed most proper for themselves.
    He goes on to say

    In almost every convention by which the constitution was adopted, amendments to guard against the abuse of power were recommended. These amendments demanded security against the apprehended encroachments of the general government-not against those of the local governments. In compliance with a sentiment thus generally expressed, to quiet fears thus extensively entertained, amendments were proposed by the required majority in congress, and adopted by the states. These amendments contain no expression indicating an intention to apply them to the state governments. This court cannot so apply them.
    Last edited by Sharpienads; 12-11-2012 at 21:46.
    Kyle

    Girlscouts? Hmmm, I don't know... I think it's kinda dangerous to teach young girls self esteem and leadership skills.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •