Close
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 36

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    A FUN TITLE asmo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Douglas County (Parker)
    Posts
    3,446

    Default Do Civilians Armed With Guns Ever Capture, Kill, or Otherwise Stop Mass Shooters?

    From the Volokh Conspiracy - for all of you that are going to get asked this over and over again for the next few weeks. I was asked twice in the last few hours while on a plane.

    http://www.volokh.com/2012/12/14/do-...mass-shooters/

    Backers of laws that let pretty much all law-abiding carry concealed guns in public places often argue that these laws will sometimes enable people to stop mass shootings. Opponents occasionally ask: If that’s so, what examples can one give of civilians armed with guns stopping such shootings? Sometimes, I hear people asking if even one such example can be found, or saying that they haven’t heard even one such example.

    Naturally, such examples will be rare, partly because mass shootings are rare, partly because many mass shootings happen in supposedly “gun-free” zones (such as schools, universities, or private property posted with a no-guns sign) in which gun carrying isn’t allowed, and partly for other reasons. Moreover, at least some examples are contested, because it might be unclear — as you’ll see below — whether the shooter had been planning to kill more people when he was stopped. But here are instances that I have seen, not counting killings stopped by people who were off-duty police officers (or police officers from other jurisdictions) at the time of the shooting.

    1. In Pearl, Mississippi in 1997, 16-year-old Luke Woodham stabbed and bludgeoned to death his mother at home, then killed two students and injured seven at his high school. As he was leaving the school, he was stopped by Assistant Principal Joel Myrick, who had gone out to get a handgun from his car. I have seen sources that state that Woodham was on the way to Pearl Junior High School to continue shooting, though I couldn’t find any contemporaneous news articles that so state.
    2. In Edinboro, Pennsylvania in 1996, 14-year-old Andrew Wurst shot and killed a teacher at a school dance, and shot and injured several other students. He had just left the dance hall, carrying his gun — possibly to attack more people, though the stories that I’ve seen are unclear — when he was confronted by the dance hall owner James Strand, who lived next door and kept a shotgun at home. It’s not clear whether Wurst was planning to kill others, would have gotten into a gun battle with the police, or would have otherwise killed more people had Strand not stopped him.
    3. In Winnemucca, Nevada in 2008, Ernesto Villagomez killed two people and wounded two others in a bar filled with three hundred people. He was then shot and killed by a patron who was carrying a gun (and had a concealed carry license). It’s not clear whether Villagomez would have killed more people; the killings were apparently the result of a family feud, and I could see no information on whether Villagomez had more names on his list, nor could one tell whether he would have killed more people in trying to evade capture.
    4. In Colorado Springs in 2007, Matthew Murray killed four people at a church. He was then shot several times by Jeanne Assam, a church member, volunteer security guard, and former police officer (she had been dismissed by a police department 10 years before, and to my knowledge hadn’t worked as a police officer since). Murray, knocked down and badly wounded, killed himself; it is again not clear whether he would have killed more people had he not been wounded, but my guess is that he would have.

    So it appears that civilians armed with guns are sometimes willing to intervene to stop someone who had just committed a mass shooting in public. In what fraction of mass shootings would such interventions happen, if gun possession were allowed in the places where the shootings happen? We don’t know. In what fraction would interventions prevent more killings and injuries, as opposed to capturing or killing the murderer after he’s already done? We don’t know. In what fraction would interventions lead to more injuries to bystanders? Again, we don’t know. Finally, always keep in mind that mass shootings in public places should not be the main focus in the gun debate, whether for gun control or gun decontrol: They on average account for much less than 1% of all homicides in the U.S., and are unusually hard to stop through gun control laws (since the killer is bent on committing a publicly visible murder and is thus unlikely to be much deterred by gun control law, or by the prospect of encountering an armed bystander).

    Still, people have asked for examples of some shootings in which a civilian armed with a gun intervened and brought down the shooter — so here they are.
    Last edited by asmo; 12-14-2012 at 17:38.
    What is my joy if all hands, even the unclean, can reach into it? What is my wisdom, if even the fools can dictate to me? What is my freedom, if all creatures, even the botched and impotent, are my masters? What is my life, if I am but to bow, to agree and to obey?
    -- Ayn Rand, Anthem (Chapter 11)

  2. #2
    Zombie Slayer Zundfolge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Wichita, KS (formerly COS)
    Posts
    8,317

    Default

    The problem is that most of the time when someone stops a mass shooter it's not a story about how some brave soul stopped a mass shooter, its a story about how someone shot an armed man. It barely makes the local news (let alone national) and people don't realize the number of people actually saved.
    Modern liberalism is based on the idea that reality is obligated to conform to one's beliefs because; "I have the right to believe whatever I want".

    "Everything the State says is a lie, and everything it has it has stolen.
    -Friedrich Nietzsche

    "Every time something really bad happens, people cry out for safety, and the government answers by taking rights away from good people."
    -Penn Jillette

    A World Without Guns <- Great Read!

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Larimer County
    Posts
    1,580
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    As of yet, NO. The cowards have all chosen places that are void of people capable of legally defending themself adequately.

  4. #4
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Rural Weld County
    Posts
    209

    Default

    American Rifleman and/or American Hunter devote at least 1/2 page to armed citizen every month. That is about the only place I remember seeing something on that order.

  5. #5
    Bang Bang Ridge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Cedar Park, TX
    Posts
    8,307

    Default

    Sikh Temple shooting, an armed civilian stopped the gunman.
    Same for the shooting at the church in CO Springs a couple years ago.

  6. #6
    If I had a son he would look like....Ben SideShow Bob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    SE Aurora
    Posts
    7,121

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ridge View Post
    Same for the shooting at the church in CO Springs a couple years ago.
    That was an armed security, if I remember correctly, an off duty LEO. Not a common Joe or Jane with a CCW.
    My T.P. wheeling and dealing feedback is here.

    Opinions are like assholes, everybody has one, and it stinks more than mine.


    Yo Homie, That my chainsaw ?



    Pati, improbe et vince

  7. #7
    Grand Master Know It All clublights's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    2,517

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SideShow Bob View Post
    That was an armed security, if I remember correctly, an off duty LEO. Not a common Joe or Jane with a CCW.
    She is listed above.. former cop .. volunteer security ... pretty sure she had a CCW...

  8. #8
    Don of the Asian Mafia ChunkyMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Centennial, CO
    Posts
    8,397
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SideShow Bob View Post
    That was an armed security, if I remember correctly, an off duty LEO. Not a common Joe or Jane with a CCW.
    She was not LEO nor security. After the fact, the church moved to protect her by claiming she is a volunteered security. Sadly, the church shy away from her after she came out. Few of my relatives stopped going to that church afterward.
    Quote Originally Posted by crays View Post
    It doesn't matter how many rifles you buy...they're still cheaper than one wife, in the long run.
    Coarf Feedback
    Instagram

  9. #9
    Gong Shooter PSS's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Delta
    Posts
    438

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ChunkyMonkey View Post
    She was not LEO nor security. After the fact, the church moved to protect her by claiming she is a volunteered security. Sadly, the church shy away from her after she came out. Few of my relatives stopped going to that church afterward.

    Nooo... a church not agreeing with homosexuality? What is this world coming to?
    To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.

  10. #10
    a cool, fancy title hollohas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Littleton
    Posts
    6,072

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SideShow Bob View Post
    That was an armed security, if I remember correctly, an off duty LEO. Not a common Joe or Jane with a CCW.
    This is the same argument I have seen the anti's use time and time again. That she wasn't a "civilian" so it doesn't count. She was retired and a volunteer, so yeah, it counts. A retired LEO is a civilian like anyone else.

    I carry at church and I volunteer to hangout in the foyer to monitor the church and parking lot during service multiple times each month. Does that mean I am "armed security" and not a civilian? Of course not. I am an armed civilian.

    As for the other cases, the anti's always say "well, the killer was done shooting by the time they were confronted by an armed individual, so they didn't actually stop anything." Assumptions and conjecture, always to downplay the actions of a good guy with a gun.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •