You know the feeling, you read a "news" story about this or that (mostly guns lately) and you come across something that really makes you question the knowledge behind the piece. Things that most people look over and accept as fact... What happened to citing sources and backing up your information?
http://news.msn.com/us/know-your-states-gun-regulations
Little slideshow on MSN (which I believe about .1% of what I read any more...almost all editorials, not news) about what the gun regulations are. Last slide is this:
Other: 20%? WTF is an "other" firearm? Handgun, rifle, shotgun...pretty much covers it from my perspective... Maybe I'm forgetting spit wad shooters or flare guns or something... In my experience, when dealing with statistics, if you have two categories that make up a total of 8%, and "other" is 20%, that "other" category better get broken down more or your numbers are worthless...but then, it is on MSN, so maybe they are going for worthless...