Welcome to the Colorado AR-15 Shooters Club Discussion Forums.
So if Bans are so effective then
I was thinking this morning that if gun bans are so effective then the police and domestic law enforcement would have no need for their guns. If normal everyday citizens are safe with gun bans in place then law enforcement should no longer have a need for their guns and should turn them over and have them melted down.
many of the police in GB have....
Wouldn't expect it here any more than I'd expect you or I to turn em in.
They just want guns to be banned to feel safer. Banning guns does just the opposite.
Remember the Ft. Hood shooting. The only one armed other than the crazy was Military Police.
This does little to prove the point to the gun ban crowd.. they like to forget about it.
Mass shootings and mass violence is a product of population density. The more population density the greater chance of mas violence. This happens in all animals not just humans.
We need to ban cities!!
Last edited by Colorado Osprey; 12-19-2012 at 08:58.
I say lets all remove the warning labels and let nature take its course.
Police: "but the criminals will still have guns so we need our's to protect you." Ding-Ding
We seem to forget our history-
IN 1997, three years after the AWB took effect, the LA bank robbery/shootout happened, with the criminals using ACTUAL full auto assault weapons. The police were so outgunned that they had to turn to SPORTING GOODS stores to go buy some AR-15 semi-auto rifles, high- cap magazines, and thank GOD they were in stock, ready for immediate delivery. Had those rifles been banned many more police officers would have lost their lives along with potential citizen casualties.
ETA-
There has been a rise in mass shootings because the perpetrators specifically target GUN FREE ZONES- where they know it is unlikely there will not be any firearms. Shopping malls, schools, churches, sporting events, theatres. All public gathering places and many of which prohibit firearms. We now know Holmes drove past at least one other theatre where there was armed security to the Aurora theatre where there was no armed security (which for that theater was typically off-duty law enforcement) at that midnight showing. Even then, he was diabolical enough to leave his weapons outside in case there WAS an armed guard in the lobby who might have noticed he was carrying. As soon as an armed respondent was on scene he gave up. Same with this Connecticut whacko, as soon as police arrived, he ate a bullet. Same with the mall shooter, as soon as he saw a gun pointed in his direction from a CCW holder, sat down and had a lead lunch.
Fear of armed response is what PREVENTS these actions, and the more we disarm society, the worse its going to get.
Banning weapons does no good for anyone.
Last edited by dwalker460; 12-19-2012 at 09:15.
Actually I believe there were less mass shootings (26) post '90s assault weapons ban than (42) during the assault weapons ban
Quoted for truth! But people can't get this through their stupid heads!Originally Posted by dwalker460
"There is no news in the truth, and no truth in the news."
"The revolution will not be televised... Instead it will be filmed from multiple angles via cell phone cameras, promptly uploaded to YouTube, Tweeted about, and then shared on Facebook, pending a Wi-Fi connection."
I know instead of seeing if we can ban and confiscate 300 million plus guns, lets get rid of the 12-20 million illegal aliens first, then we can see how gun control works. Also I expect contraband and weapons to [magically] disappear from prisons, so that they are as safe to be in as the ritz carlton.
If you wouldn't mind and if you have the info handy, could you either post those incidents and/or pm me. I am trying to put some information together for the anti's on this.
How do you have more posts than I do? Something is wrong here....
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote