Welcome to the Colorado AR-15 Shooters Club Discussion Forums.
+1
Here's another big difference. McCain might sign a anti-gun bill that Congress puts on his desk. It's a long road to get an anti-gun bill through both houses. Hillbilly (I like that better than Billary) on the other hand would issue executive orders to the IRS, ATF, AG, etc. that would demolish the 2nd amendment - and once that's gone, how long before there's no Bill of Rights left?
Very true
Sarcasm, Learn it, Know it, Live it....
Spleify 7-27-12Marlin is the end all be all of everything COAR-15...
The fact is we have been wasting our votes for a long time. This is why the country is in the situation that its in.
I heard the same crap at the caucus last night. Everyone thinks that having a "R" behind the presidents name is going to save us a few years. Sure worked with King George. The fact is they are all the same.
Its really pathetic that the norm is voting for the less of two evils.
Maybe if more people start voting for real, this country can be a great one once again.
mcpain went out of his way to stick his anti gun nose into our business back when all the CCW stuff was going on a few years ago.
I remember, I will never vote for him.
Last night the couple in front of me got up and spoke to all of us sitting there.
They said," We support Mitt Romney because he is the most conservative out of all the "electable" canidates."
The message I will send is that I won't follow the mainstream media's pick of who is electable.
Unfortunetly the message that this couple will send is "we will eat the smallest amount of shit that you serve us"
Your right you won't change my mind.
No hard feelings, just my opinion.
Originally Posted by foxtrot
Well to be honest i think the type of attitude "vote for R because the others have no chance" is what is ruining our country. If we got rid of the GOP and replaced it with a Conservative party we'd be way better off....
A vote for the right candidate is a vote for the right candidate not a vote for anyone else. To be honest if it helps get rid of the GOP it's the right thing to do.
That's totally unrealistic. Perot got a large amount of "third party" votes. It accomplished nothing. I'd say I'm more libertarian then anything and it's unrealistic to even think anything other then dems or reps have a chance. It would take an extremely rich person or group to fund a third party to the point it would be taken seriously. And even then it would take decades to accomplish.
Well decades is better than two democratic parties.
this may come off as a bit extreme, but here goes...
its time people took a stand, and voted for the right person in their eyes. that is how it is supposed to be.
if we get some sh!t bag in there, so be it. it's not like this countries government isn't 100 years over due for a top to bottom overhaul.
see my sigline. it's time. this country is NOT what it's supposed to be and 100 years past the point where something would have been handled the "old fashioned way".
communism/liberalism/socialsim DOESNT work for the common man, only those in charge. Ask anyone who's lived it. The libs are in for a rude awakening, the crap they're led to belive and spew out of their mouths is pure bs.
MAYBE, JUST MAYBE, this may be the fuel needed to motivate people to take a stand....oh wait, what was I thinking.. everyone is too lazy and likes freebies.. nevermind
I'm right there with ya bud, I just hope there are enough of us left.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote