Close
Page 1 of 6 123456 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 58
  1. #1
    Paintball Shooter SirSai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Longmont, CO
    Posts
    46

    Default Senator Feinstein's Proposed 2013 Legislation

    I don't believe I saw a post on this yet so here it is. As if you guys don't have more stuff to grind your gears.

    http://www.feinstein.senate.gov/publ...ssault-weapons

    I think it's all a bunch of hoopla!

  2. #2
    Industry Partner BPTactical's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    North Metro
    Posts
    13,932

    Default

    But I thought Ol Joe was heading up this project......

    I see the cost of implementing this plan being an obstacle.

    Here is the gist of it:
    Summary of 2013 legislation


    Following is a summary of the 2013 legislation:

    • Bans the sale, transfer, importation, or manufacturing of:
      • 120 specifically-named firearms
      • Certain other semiautomatic rifles, handguns, shotguns that can accept a detachable magazine and have one military characteristic
      • Semiautomatic rifles and handguns with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds

    • Strengthens the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban and various state bans by:
      • Moving from a 2-characteristic test to a 1-characteristic test
      • Eliminating the easy-to-remove bayonet mounts and flash suppressors from the characteristics test
      • Banning firearms with “thumbhole stocks” and “bullet buttons” to address attempts to “work around” prior bans

    • Bans large-capacity ammunition feeding devices capable of accepting more than 10 rounds.
    • Protects legitimate hunters and the rights of existing gun owners by:
      • Grandfathering weapons legally possessed on the date of enactment
      • Exempting over 900 specifically-named weapons used for hunting or sporting purposes and
      • Exempting antique, manually-operated, and permanently disabled weapons

    • Requires that grandfathered weapons be registered under the National Firearms Act, to include:
      • Background check of owner and any transferee;
      • Type and serial number of the firearm;
      • Positive identification, including photograph and fingerprint;
      • Certification from local law enforcement of identity and that possession would not violate State or local law; and
      • Dedicated funding for ATF to implement registration

    Hey Dianne
    Last edited by BPTactical; 12-27-2012 at 07:55.
    The most important thing to be learned from those who demand "Equality For All" is that all are not equal...

    Gun Control - seeking a Hardware solution for a Software problem...

  3. #3
    Plinker
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Fort Collins
    Posts
    73

    Default

    we've got to keep making calls an writing letters, i'll be sending out another round of letters today.

  4. #4
    Gong Shooter
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    S/E Aurora
    Posts
    457

    Default

    Agreed. There are portions of this that are going to be too expensive to implement. They can't even address the current budget issues, I can't see them piling on more "social" plans that increase cost.

    Quote Originally Posted by BPTactical View Post
    But I thought Ol Joe was heading up this project......

    I see the cost of implementing this plan being an obstacle.

  5. #5
    Paper Hunter
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Westminster
    Posts
    103

    Default

    I don't see this going very far...
    MY FEEDBACK - Lost a few posts since the site was restored.

  6. #6
    Guest
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Aurora, Co
    Posts
    625

    Default

    And I didn't think Barry would get a 2nd term either

    Quote Originally Posted by Adam View Post
    I don't see this going very far...

  7. #7
    Gong Shooter MAP's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Windsor, CO
    Posts
    425

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adam View Post
    I don't see this going very far...
    She may not get everything, but she may get something.

    I hope she gets nothing.

    Mike

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BPTactical View Post
    But I thought Ol Joe was heading up this project......

    I see the cost of implementing this plan being an obstacle.

    Here is the gist of it:
    Summary of 2013 legislation


    Following is a summary of the 2013 legislation:

    • Bans the sale, transfer, importation, or manufacturing of:
      • 120 specifically-named firearms
      • Certain other semiautomatic rifles, handguns, shotguns that can accept a detachable magazine and have one military characteristic
      • Semiautomatic rifles and handguns with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds

    • Strengthens the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban and various state bans by:
      • Moving from a 2-characteristic test to a 1-characteristic test
      • Eliminating the easy-to-remove bayonet mounts and flash suppressors from the characteristics test
      • Banning firearms with “thumbhole stocks” and “bullet buttons” to address attempts to “work around” prior bans

    • Bans large-capacity ammunition feeding devices capable of accepting more than 10 rounds.
    • Protects legitimate hunters and the rights of existing gun owners by:
      • Grandfathering weapons legally possessed on the date of enactment
      • Exempting over 900 specifically-named weapons used for hunting or sporting purposes and
      • Exempting antique, manually-operated, and permanently disabled weapons

    • Requires that grandfathered weapons be registered under the National Firearms Act, to include:
      • Background check of owner and any transferee;
      • Type and serial number of the firearm;
      • Positive identification, including photograph and fingerprint;
      • Certification from local law enforcement of identity and that possession would not violate State or local law; and
      • Dedicated funding for ATF to implement registration

    Hey Dianne
    So uh... Does this also make them all SBR-able? Ya know, since they're all gonna be treated the same and stuff.

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MAP View Post
    She may not get everything, but she may get something.

    I hope she gets nothing.

    Mike

  10. #10
    Machine Gunner Kraven251's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Parker
    Posts
    1,732

    Default

    It takes them 6 months to process anything now, this isn't even feasible, but it is a pretty interesting way to turn 1/3 of the country into felons.


    Also pretty sure she doesn't comprehend what the registered part of the firearm is...especially in the case of the AR platform.
    Last edited by Kraven251; 12-27-2012 at 09:15.
    Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

    Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem. --TJ

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •