Close
Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst 123456
Results 51 to 58 of 58
  1. #51
    High Power Shooter james_bond_007's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Westminster
    Posts
    926

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BPTactical View Post
    • Strengthens the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban and various state bans by:
      • Moving from a 2-characteristic test to a 1-characteristic test
      • Eliminating the easy-to-remove bayonet mounts and flash suppressors from the characteristics test
      • Banning firearms with “thumbhole stocks” and “bullet buttons” to address attempts to “work around” prior bans


    Am I reading this correctly ?

    "Bayonet Lugs will be OK ?"
    __________________________________________________ ______________________________________
    The fattest knight at King Arthur’s round table was Sir Cumference. He acquired his size from too much π.

  2. #52
    Newbie, or Trading Post Troll gemery's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    67

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fmedges View Post
    "No one Is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it."

    "All citizens and legal residents of the United States, by their presence on the territory of the United States, are subject to the militia duty, the duty of the social compact that creates the society, which requires that each, alone and in concert with others, not only obey the Constitution and constitutional official acts, but help enforce them, if necessary, at the risk of one's life."

  3. #53
    Machine Gunner
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    westminster
    Posts
    2,232

    Default

    Like bayonets are used in a lot of crimes. Or flash hiders are really a problem. Or the ability to release the magazine using a button or implement to push the button is a big freakin deal. This bitch makes my blood boil.

  4. #54
    Paper Hunter omegalopez's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    SW Denver
    Posts
    182

    Default

    It's okay for her but not us HAAaaaaa.


    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Governm...itbart+Feed%29

  5. #55
    The "Godfather" of COAR Great-Kazoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Washboard Alley, AZ.
    Posts
    48,099

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BPTactical View Post
    Good luck Dianne, Heller REALLY muddies your wishes:
    Until mid year when one of the Justices announces their retirement.
    The Great Kazoo's Feedback

    "when you're happy you enjoy the melody but, when you're broken you understand the lyrics".

  6. #56
    Machine Gunner Kraven251's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Parker
    Posts
    1,732

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jim View Post
    Until mid year when one of the Justices announces their retirement.
    I'll be fairly happy if we make it to mid year before the country is fubar, and that isn't even considering any firearm legislation.
    Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

    Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem. --TJ

  7. #57
    Carries A Danged Big Stick buffalobo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Hoyt
    Posts
    15,882

    Default

    This legislation has one purpose, registration for future confiscation. There is no other reason for registration. Whatever gets passed is just another step on the path. The 94 AWB was a setup for this legislation and any legislation passed in the near future will be set up for next step on the path.

    Incrementalism at its finest.

    There is only one goal, complete disarmament. Any compromise is a win for the anti's. That is why incrementalism is successful. They have all the time in the world. We only have our diligence.
    Last edited by buffalobo; 12-28-2012 at 09:53.
    If you're unarmed, you are a victim


    Feedback

  8. #58
    Fire Crotch
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Charlottesville, VA
    Posts
    6,508

    Default

    "I know the sense of helplessness that people feel. I know the urge to arm yourself because that's what I did. I was trained in firearms. I walked to the hospital when my husband was sick. I carried a concealed weapon and I made the determination if somebody was going to try and take me out, I was going to take them with me."

    Really? She implied she was going to kill someone who tried to attack her? I think all CCW holders now would say they only shoot to stop the threat, not flat out kill the person.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •