Think about this for a second. The front sight is in X plane, it's not adustable for elevation (meaning it can't go up and down)
You want a rear sight that goes up and down to match that front sight because your current sight is too low
But even if you get one, where is it going to end up?
That's right, way down low where the other one is.
so, your problem will still be the same.
Brian H
Longmont CO
"I am free, no matter what rules surround me. If I find them tolerable, I tolerate them; if I find them too obnoxious, I break them. I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything I do."
I expected that.
When I eyeball it, that Hayes Research front sight just doesn't look that much lower than my PRI flip-up or Troy Industries flip-up. Guess it doesn't take much though.
I may mount the Hayes Research and Troy flip-up front on the same rail for comparison.
Mike
If you're going to measure, get or borrow a set of calipers and measure from the bottom of the mount (the rail top) to the middle of the apeture (rear) or post (front) and compare the measurements. If indeed the Hayes are standard height (which they don't look to be) then the problem is how you're aligning your hat rack to get your sight picture.
As I said in the post that started this topic, I don't much care for the rear sight, but I like the front sight.
I was hoping to avoid it, but I fully expected to have to raise the front sight. Knowing I need to raise it .3" is useful. Thank you.
Now back to the topic of a good elevation-adjustable CQB-type rear sight. We've seen there are several options. Is there anything to distinguish one from the other?
Mike