Close
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 37
  1. #21
    Not Here Dude
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    1,205

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by michael_aos View Post
    I'm a little fuzzy on the physics involved, but...

    I'd like to replace the Hayes Research rear sight and retain the Hayes Research front sight.
    Ok. Here's the short version.

    Not gonna happen. No one else makes a rear BUIS that will line up with that non-standard plane height Hayes front BUIS.

  2. #22
    Machine Gunner
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Longmont, CO
    Posts
    2,144

    Default

    Originally Posted by michael_aos
    I'm a little fuzzy on the physics involved, but...

    I'd like to replace the Hayes Research rear sight and retain the Hayes Research front sight.



    Think about this for a second. The front sight is in X plane, it's not adustable for elevation (meaning it can't go up and down)
    You want a rear sight that goes up and down to match that front sight because your current sight is too low
    But even if you get one, where is it going to end up?
    That's right, way down low where the other one is.
    so, your problem will still be the same.
    Brian H
    Longmont CO

    "I am free, no matter what rules surround me. If I find them tolerable, I tolerate them; if I find them too obnoxious, I break them. I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything I do."

  3. #23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnTRourke View Post
    [/I]
    Think about this for a second. The front sight is in X plane, it's not adustable for elevation (meaning it can't go up and down)
    You want a rear sight that goes up and down to match that front sight because your current sight is too low
    But even if you get one, where is it going to end up?
    That's right, way down low where the other one is.
    so, your problem will still be the same.
    Yeah, that's what I figured as well. Thus the discussion.

    When I slap a Larue BUIS on there and look through it, everything seems great. I have no idea where it would be shooting though.

    Mike

  4. #24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KellyTTE View Post
    Ok. Here's the short version.

    Not gonna happen. No one else makes a rear BUIS that will line up with that non-standard plane height Hayes front BUIS.
    I'm not surprised. Figured that was coming.

    I might be able to stick it on a little picatinny riser though.


  5. #25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KellyTTE View Post
    No one else makes a rear BUIS that will line up with that non-standard plane height Hayes front BUIS.
    I expected that.

    When I eyeball it, that Hayes Research front sight just doesn't look that much lower than my PRI flip-up or Troy Industries flip-up. Guess it doesn't take much though.

    I may mount the Hayes Research and Troy flip-up front on the same rail for comparison.

    Mike

  6. #26
    Not Here Dude
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    1,205

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by michael_aos View Post
    I expected that.

    When I eyeball it, that Hayes Research front sight just doesn't look that much lower than my PRI flip-up or Troy Industries flip-up. Guess it doesn't take much though.

    I may mount the Hayes Research and Troy flip-up front on the same rail for comparison.

    Mike
    If you're going to measure, get or borrow a set of calipers and measure from the bottom of the mount (the rail top) to the middle of the apeture (rear) or post (front) and compare the measurements. If indeed the Hayes are standard height (which they don't look to be) then the problem is how you're aligning your hat rack to get your sight picture.

  7. #27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KellyTTE View Post
    If you're going to measure
    Maybe after the cat has finished her nap.


  8. #28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KellyTTE View Post
    If you're going to measure, get or borrow a set of calipers and measure from the bottom of the mount (the rail top) to the middle of the apeture (rear) or post (front) and compare the measurements. If indeed the Hayes are standard height (which they don't look to be) then the problem is how you're aligning your hat rack to get your sight picture.
    From the top of the rail, to the top of the post on the Hayes Research fixed front sight measures pretty much exactly 1.0".

    Mike

  9. #29
    Not Here Dude
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    1,205

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by michael_aos View Post
    Maybe after the cat has finished her nap.

    Well I see that you have a target to zero with already.

    Top of my Colt HBAR rail to the middle of the USGI Matech rear sight: 1.30

    Yah, you're screwed. Either put both your front and back sights on risers (ugh) or get USGI compliant BUIS.

  10. #30

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KellyTTE View Post
    Either put both your front and back sights on risers or get USGI compliant BUIS.
    As I said in the post that started this topic, I don't much care for the rear sight, but I like the front sight.

    I was hoping to avoid it, but I fully expected to have to raise the front sight. Knowing I need to raise it .3" is useful. Thank you.

    Now back to the topic of a good elevation-adjustable CQB-type rear sight. We've seen there are several options. Is there anything to distinguish one from the other?

    Mike

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •