Some thoughts on Heller v D.C.

[DOC]

The courts decide what it says. Not what is written. If they want to say it narrowly means handguns that are semiauto like a revolver but not semi auto like a glock that is how low they will go. The court needs to grow some balls and widely define it and put an end to all the bickering about what guns are ok.
But with all the shootings lately the spell cast over the non gun owners out there it would seem like its not the right time to be progun. I disagree, now is the right time to put an end to the histaria about guns while the leftist gun grabbers have worked people into a frenzy. Its not popular but right.

[Storm]

I agree with Bailey on the "common usage" condition of Heller as ammunition against either a state or Federal AWB. If won, it would restrict or nullify all the other state AWBs like California and New York. ;-) :-D

[BPTactical]

I agree with Bailey on the "common usage" condition of Heller as ammunition against either a state or Federal AWB. If won, it would restrict or nullify all the other state AWBs like California and New York. ;-) :-D

Not really, you need to read more of the opinion on Heller v DC. It does state that a class of firearm may not be banned it also states that regulation may be executed at a state level.