Close
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Master of the Metallic Element Tinelement's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Broomfield
    Posts
    3,463

    Default NY clerk won't release gun owner names

    Just saw this on the news. I get the public record, but I would not be a happy camper if my name and address showed up on a road map.!

    Glad someone is standing up for the people!!

    http://kmgh.m0bl.net/w/news-world/story/81923339/

    The Journal News, which serves New York City's northern suburbs, sparked an outcry last month when it published clickable online maps with the names and addresses of pistol permit holders in Rockland and Westchester counties.

    When the newspaper requested the same information from Putnam, Sant initially said the county needed more time to fulfill the request. Sant balked entirely this week, saying the law gives him the prerogative to refuse to release public information if it endangers the public. Judges and police officers could be targeted by the people they put behind bars, he said. People with orders of protection have expressed concern to him about would-be attackers finding them through the database.

  2. #2
    DSB, Monky, & Spyder's Main Squeeze patrick0685's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Johnson City, TN
    Posts
    6,567

    Default

    good for them
    My Feedback

    "I don't listen to the women I do know, why would I listen to some crazy bitch from the ocean?" ~ Spyder

  3. #3
    Machine Gunner Kraven251's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Parker
    Posts
    1,732

    Default

    Balls. Someone found them
    Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

    Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem. --TJ

  4. #4
    Grand Master Know It All Sawin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    144th & I25
    Posts
    3,939

    Default

    I saw it yesterday too, and was impressed with him. He did an interview with Megyn Kelly on Fox, and said he'd only release the list if he was sued and taken to court over it.

    Video - here: http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/01/03...ermit-holders/
    Please leave any relevant feedback here:
    Sawin - Feedback thread.

  5. #5
    Fallen Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Smyrna, GA
    Posts
    6,748

    Default

    "The argument has been made and rejected," said Robert Freeman of the State Committee on Open Government. "There's never been any indication that disclosure resulted in any jeopardy."
    Edward S. Rudofsky, a New York attorney who specializes in the First Amendment, added, "I don't see why technology makes this any more or less sensitive than it would otherwise be."


    Derp, The first amendment only applied to printing presses, not to the internet, Databases and television... they didn't even have that then so how could the founding fathers intend for that?

    [/sarcasm]

    Last edited by Byte Stryke; 01-04-2013 at 13:26.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •