I have two problems with this:
1. How does "assaulting" a LEO, regardless if he/she is a volunteer, uniformed or non-uniformed, be somehow placed into an immediately higher penalty than a "civilian" assault?
2. Would the same argument for "it's against the law" be made if the offender was a 10 year old girl with a broom handle? Would she too face the incarceration and $50K bond?
I won't get into the rest of this, because this whole scenario is bullshit, "cop bashing" or not.




Reply With Quote

