Peter Boyles doing good job covering Sandy Hook inconsistencies!

[rocktot]

No one else is doing this, 'cept Alex Jones. Good shows, give a listen and GET ACTIVE.

http://www.khow.com/pages/boyles.html

[SouthPaw]

Listen to him every morning, and yes he has been doing a great job covering it.

[mahabali]

Wow, worth looking at and listening to.

[colorider]

The long gun video is as clear as it gets.

[Mountain Man]

I was sent an article with some footage. If its legit somebody has some serious explaining to do.

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/340113




Edit: looks like some of the same footage. It just gets to the weapon footage quicker.

[splogan]

It will all go away, it does not further a political agenda.

[colorider]

Maybe the NRA should demand they explain wtf the video is showing , and the comments made by the expert coroner. They would get more press out of a demand then anyone else.

[hollohas]

It will all go away, it does not further a political agenda.

Exactly. EVERY recent questionable event has gone away with either relativity little noise or no noise at all. Fast and Furious, Benghazi, this...

It won't go any further than what the mass media has already reported. No one will ever see the coroner's reports or pictures of the weapons/evidence. The killer is dead, so there will be no trial to present that stuff.

Something is fishy, but we will never know why.

[GlockDog47]

Peter Boyle is a good guy. Stands up for the right things.

[cmailliard]

I don't think the gun found in the car in the dark grainy video is an AR15, I think it is a shotgun, the round being ejected is rather large more a shell than a .223 round. The audio from the day has one officer say "multiple guns, rifle and shotgun" at one point on the audio. I do not know where this officer was when he said this. But he said both rifle and shotgun in the same sentence.

As far as all of the video, audio, podcasts, phone calls, etc. I do not believe ANY of it unless I am talking face to face with someone who is well known and vetted. Face to face because body language is everything and it is hard to keep to a false story if you are not referencing notes. Even this guy on the Peter Boyles show can be a fraud. Any whistle dick can show up and be an "expert", especially one who calls in and dosen't use his real name. I don't think 9/11 was a conspiracy and I don't think this is either. I think a lot of this bad and/or conflicting info is due to this being a large, very pubic incident with a very inexperienced small police department with social media and emotion being a big part of the misinformation. The same thing happened with Tropical Storm Sandy, social media can be very bad or very good. In most cases the very bad wins over the very good.

When he is talking about the other "suspects" that is a bunch of BS. That statement by this call in commentator just caused him to loose all credibility with me. This happens everyday with normal police incidents, not just mass shootings, Columbine and VonMaur are the two most well known examples where it happened in mass shootings. Shit, at Columbine Police chased down and nearly tackeld a Fire Chief trying to land a helicopter because nobody had a clue what was going on. At VonMaur they detained someone fitting the description of the shooter only to let him go, no other info about it, why should it be different here? They detained people who had nothing to do with the shooting and let them go, big deal.

I guess what I am saying is don't believe everything you see or hear, even the stuff that fits what your thoughts are. This guy on Peter Boyles is obviously out to protect gun owners rights, but I have a hard time believing everything he says.