Close
Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 59
  1. #41
    Varmiteer ANADRILL's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Englewood,Co
    Posts
    736

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ronin13 View Post
    Your argument kinda lost traction when you said "fudge packers." Whether you agree with it or not, it's here, it's not going anywhere, and the best we can do is try and respect others' without infringing upon their life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.
    I stand behind calling them fudge packers, fufus, sugar shoes, pink boys, and rainbow brites.. Screw being PC, it's what got us in the mess we are in now...
    Thanks,
    R

  2. #42
    Ammocurious Rucker61's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO, USA
    Posts
    3,359

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ANADRILL View Post
    I stand behind, calling them fudge packers, fufus, sugar shoes, pink boys, and rainbow brites.. Screw being PC, it's what got us in the mess we are in now...
    What are you doing standing behind them? Wide stance?

  3. #43
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Evergreen CO
    Posts
    234

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Troublco View Post
    Well...ignoring what most of this thread has degenerated into - I find some of what they say in that article disturbing. As has been mentioned, children are not equipped to make decisions regarding sexual relationships, period. I believe that a convicted pedophile (and I am talking about someone who molests/rapes/whatever word you want to use; a prepubescent child, not a 17 year old) has no place in society. There's a substantial difference between someone who thinks about something (although who would want to think about this, I don't know) and someone who acts upon these thoughts. And I agree, you can't compare homosexuality with pedophilia.

    I think it's telling that even prison inmates generally won't abide a pedophile or child murderer, or so I'm given to understand.
    Hey someone read the article. I think all normal people can agree that any adult who would try and justify this crime against nature is a sick fuck. The problem is the "ostrich with its head in the sand" attitude to recognizing and accepting "progressive creep". I don't care what social upheaval you want to name from the abolitionists to the feminazis to the rainbow nation to the drug addicts, I guarantee you that if you went back in time to just 20 years prior to all these milestones becoming normalized, I would defy you to find 1% of the citizens of the day who would have told you "Oh sure that will happen in my lifetime"

    As was once said of the Mafia, "They aren't that good. They're just persistent".

    As the article pointed out, the progressive view isn't only across the pond. It is right on our northern border. Filthy warped canucks who have laws on the books that result in stand up comedians being locked up for telling a joke about the testicular delusional circus are promoting the idea that abuse of children should be considered normal.

    Regards your opinion of comparing one deviance to another. The word deviant has one definition: To deviate from accepted norm.
    I really don't care where a deviant want wants to stick their junk. I am sick to death of morons preaching at me that it is "normal."
    This is the same lot that want us to refer to some fool who wants to masquerade as a ugly woman as she/her.
    But I guarantee this lot would be the first to call those nice young men in their clean white coats if some guy decided he wanted to
    dress up like a baby and walk/crawl around in public dressed in a diaper with a pacifier in his mouth.

  4. #44
    Ammocurious Rucker61's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO, USA
    Posts
    3,359

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Melvin View Post
    Hey someone read the article. I think all normal people can agree that any adult who would try and justify this crime against nature is a sick fuck. The problem is the "ostrich with its head in the sand" attitude to recognizing and accepting "progressive creep". I don't care what social upheaval you want to name from the abolitionists to the feminazis to the rainbow nation to the drug addicts, I guarantee you that if you went back in time to just 20 years prior to all these milestones becoming normalized, I would defy you to find 1% of the citizens of the day who would have told you "Oh sure that will happen in my lifetime"

    As was once said of the Mafia, "They aren't that good. They're just persistent".

    As the article pointed out, the progressive view isn't only across the pond. It is right on our northern border. Filthy warped canucks who have laws on the books that result in stand up comedians being locked up for telling a joke about the testicular delusional circus are promoting the idea that abuse of children should be considered normal.

    Regards your opinion of comparing one deviance to another. The word deviant has one definition: To deviate from accepted norm.
    I really don't care where a deviant want wants to stick their junk. I am sick to death of morons preaching at me that it is "normal."
    This is the same lot that want us to refer to some fool who wants to masquerade as a ugly woman as she/her.
    But I guarantee this lot would be the first to call those nice young men in their clean white coats if some guy decided he wanted to
    dress up like a baby and walk/crawl around in public dressed in a diaper with a pacifier in his mouth.
    The sexual fetish and deviation discussion forum is that way =====>.

    I think you ended up here by mistake. We discuss firearms here.

  5. #45

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Melvin View Post
    Animal liberationists = pro abortionists = gun grabbers = tree huggers = anti capitalists = anti tobacco = pro weed = anthropomorphists = feminists = anti Christians = vegans = race pimps = glbtpb = greenies = LIBS
    You have no idea what you're talking about. I am politically liberal (actually I consider myself a moderate but most on this forum would categorize me as a liberal) and I fit into exactly two of the categories you listed. 2/14, well done.

    This is the same motley crew that will stand in solidarity with the pedophiles. But then if you had read any history you would know that.
    Interesting. Off the top of my head I can name one institution that consistently defends and "stands in solidarity" with pedophiles. I'll give you a hint, it's not a liberal organization.

  6. #46
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Evergreen CO
    Posts
    234

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Brock Landers View Post
    Y


    Interesting. Off the top of my head I can name one institution that consistently defends and "stands in solidarity" with pedophiles. I'll give you a hint, it's not a liberal organization.
    Penn State

  7. #47
    Varmiteer ANADRILL's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Englewood,Co
    Posts
    736

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rucker61 View Post
    What are you doing standing behind them? Wide stance?
    The ops right to call them fudge packers.
    Thanks,
    R

  8. #48
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Evergreen CO
    Posts
    234

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Brock Landers View Post
    You have no idea what you're talking about. I am politically liberal (actually I consider myself a moderate but most on this forum would categorize me as a liberal) and I fit into exactly two of the categories you listed. 2/14, well done.
    "Absurdity is best illustrated with absurdity" - Rush Limbaugh

    I merely was following the example from the lib tent. "There’s no rational basis for saying that a human being has special rights. A rat is a pig is a dog is a boy. They’re all animals." - Ingrid Newkirk - President of PETA (yet another pommy skank polluting these shores)

  9. #49
    Sir William of Knowledge William's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    1,505

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rucker61 View Post
    What are you doing standing behind them? Wide stance?
    lmao...
    كفّار

    My feedback




  10. #50
    Ammocurious Rucker61's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO, USA
    Posts
    3,359

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Melvin View Post
    Penn State
    Another hint. The boss wears a tall hat.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •