Close
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13
  1. #11
    Guest
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Milliken, CO
    Posts
    1,421

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by trlcavscout View Post
    I have read it, read the whole thing. All it says is that medical professionals cannot collect gun owners info and give it to the feds. This was brought up shortly after the obama care came out. Its not new news.
    I disagree, to me, it says they can't require you to answer the questions to recieve health care. Because they ARE asking the questions.

  2. #12
    COAR SpecOps Team Leader theGinsue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Colo Spr
    Posts
    21,951
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ChunkyMonkey View Post
    Nevertheless, the keyword is 'lawful' possession. Soon that 'lawful' part means 10 round max!!!
    Ah! This was my exact thought on the issue as well. What is lawful today may very well be a felony tomorrow.
    Ginsue - Admin
    Proud Infidel Since 1965

    "You can't spell genius without Ginsue." -Ray1970, Apr 2020

    Ginsue's Feedback

  3. #13
    Guest
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    To the right of Fort Collins, CO
    Posts
    25

    Default

    1. "A wellness and health promotion activity implemented under subsection", 2. " a lawfully". It would apear they have limited the scope and defined the activity with the first statement. Your loacal ATF Agent is not a wellness professional engaging in wellness. If the law changes firearms will not be lawfully owned or held. It would apear to this simple country boy that the "out" is wishfull thinking. Please remember the way the tyrannical group passed the legislation in question.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •