AWB off the table... (federally)

[Fentonite]

And to fight a magazine capacity limit as well.

Absolutely.

[Ronin13]

Here's a link

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2260978/National-Rifle-Association-meet-Joe-Biden-White-House-gun-control-talks.html#ixzz2HhkZvVBT

Hmm... I was told today that official word wouldn't be released until Tuesday at the earliest...

Not convinced. Please keep writing your elected officials, and encourage everyone you know to do the same.

Please.

Quite true- this is not time to get complacent and think we won... this is just one skirmish, in one battle, we must continue. Jan 19th for instance...

[loveski]

After watching the broncos get beat and freezing my buns off (i was at the game) this is very welcome news.. Hope it pans out that way.

[SideShow Bob]

Still doesn't mean that they will not push for things like Bullet Buttons or no pistol grips and 10 or less round capacity magazines.

[DFBrews]

Still sending postcards. And writing. Even if the alb is off the table for now they will not rest until we are disarmed

[TAR31]

I just heard today- and we should be getting the news released next week- from a very reliable source (three letter gov agency) that a federal AWB will not... let me say again WILL NOT happen. Word is that the Biden Committee and several advisers close to POTUS decided to remove the AWB plans from the table. However, magazine capacity restrictions are still being discussed and planned, as well as state legislation- such as here- we need to keep our own state reps in check.

Furthermore- Count it now- 27 LEOs I have spoken to since Sandy Hook. Of those 27 all 27 have voiced (by themselves or on behalf of most if not all of their counterparts at their respective departments) that if any legislation comes down that requires any sort of unconstitutional confiscation, IT WILL NOT BE ENFORCED.
That is all.

I heard from some guy in a 4 letter gov agency the obama is actually gonna lift all NFA requirements.

Thats how stupid your vague BS post is.

[Ronin13]

I heard from some guy in a 4 letter gov agency the obama is actually gonna lift all NFA requirements.

Thats how stupid your vague BS post is.

Sorry if under threat of prosecution I can't say what agency, name or anything else- and for the fact that is "as-yet-unreleased information". Next time you want to make a comment based on a idiotic opinion, go to FB. Quite obvious you have no idea how reliable, yet anonymous/secretive source information is. I'll give you a hint- it's partly responsible for a bearded guy who is responsible for the death of 3,000 Americans was found and taken out.

ETA: Bet you'll feel pretty stupid when the actual press release comes out and my source was correct...

[lead_magnet]

Make that 28.

[Ronin13]

Make that 28.

29 if you want to count one of the state's CLEOs... but that's not his "official" stance, that was just said off the record that he wouldn't allow his department to participate in any such activity.

[Citizen_Soldier]

I really believe her bill is going to be so extreme there is no chance for it to pass. I do agree that the mag ban is coming though and while I don't agree with it I think it's going to be difficult to stop it. Especially if they grandfather existing mags.

My thinking is that perhaps she introduced such an extreme bill so that she would have leverage to work out a compromise to keep both parties happy. Instead of outright banning all these "listed assault rifles" with mandatory turn-in, they could just require NFA tax stamps, restrict magazine size, grandfather, etc. Similar laws to what Commiefornia lives under. Coming out strong gives her the chance to lessen the measures described in the bill, but still infringe upon our gun rights. Just my thoughts.

Make that 28.

Also some thoughts on confiscation. It would have to be federal agents getting paid a LOT of money going door to door. The govt is very outnumbered by the liberty loving gun owners of this nation. I'm in the WY Army National Guard and also have many LEO acquaintances, yet I can't think of a single person in such a position I personally know that would be willing to take away guns from civilian owners.