LEOs and confidentiality question

[Melvin]

Interesting question. It's pretty vague though. You want to provide details that might better assist in answering your question?

Okay no legal violation. No broken law. Moral violation in some peoples eyes. LEO said there isn't any problem. Then days later employer claims had contact from said LEO describing situation knowing full well employer has a whole holier than thou moral code. No drugs involved. Just teenage hormones.

[bogie]

Okay no legal violation. No broken law. Moral violation in some peoples eyes. LEO said there isn't any problem. Then days later employer claims had contact from said LEO describing situation knowing full well employer has a whole holier than thou moral code. No drugs involved. Just teenage hormones.

Sodomy, bestiality, necrophilia are off the table right? I kid...

[OneGuy67]

Okay no legal violation. No broken law. Moral violation in some peoples eyes. LEO said there isn't any problem. Then days later employer claims had contact from said LEO describing situation knowing full well employer has a whole holier than thou moral code. No drugs involved. Just teenage hormones.

Still pretty vague. Let's guess. You have sex with the boss's teenaged daughter in the back of a vehicle and were contacted by LEO who later told dad about catching you and daughter in the vehicle. Close?

[jerrymrc]

Still pretty vague. Let's guess. You have sex with the boss's teenaged daughter in the back of a vehicle and were contacted by LEO who later told dad about catching you and daughter in the vehicle. Close?

I would think that only because it is very rare at least in my case to be asked where you work.

[BREATHER]

What Law Enforcement Officer has to deal HIPA. Anything to do with a convict is public record. A felon losses and should not have confidential rights...

[Melvin]

Still pretty vague. Let's guess. You have sex with the boss's teenaged daughter in the back of a vehicle and were contacted by LEO who later told dad about catching you and daughter in the vehicle. Close?

Actually 2 kids having a quickie.(I am not one of the kids) Neither related to employer. Like I said employer has a holier than thou attitude, but admitted to talking with LEO at length. Damn sure employer didn't seek the conversation. Isn't a busy body just thinks sex is for procreation between married folk.

[HBARleatherneck]

delete

[Clint45]

Is there any confidentiality guidelines in CO that prevent an LEO who has made contact with you but there were no violations, then going and discussing the subject of that contact with your employer
when it has nothing to do with the employer, but results in you losing your job?

Actually 2 kids having a quickie.(I am not one of the kids) Neither related to employer. Like I said employer has a holier than thou attitude, but admitted to talking with LEO at length. Damn sure employer didn't seek the conversation. Isn't a busy body just thinks sex is for procreation between married folk.

And I'm assuming this occurred on the employer's premises, perhaps in the parking lot?

[Melvin]

And I'm assuming this occurred on the employer's premises, perhaps in the parking lot?

Miles from it. Employer would never had known this event ever occurred but for the gossip monger.

The two things had about as much connection as a kangaroo turd in the Aussie desert and a glass of vodka in Finland. I believe it was spitefulness on the part of LEO who knew the employer and knew the reaction the news would get.

[spqrzilla]

Actually 2 kids having a quickie.(I am not one of the kids) Neither related to employer. Like I said employer has a holier than thou attitude, but admitted to talking with LEO at length. Damn sure employer didn't seek the conversation. Isn't a busy body just thinks sex is for procreation between married folk.

The employer has violated Colorado law. Colorado provides that termination based on off duty conduct unrelated to the job is illegal.