Close
Page 9 of 11 FirstFirst ... 4567891011 LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 108

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Guest
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Westminster, CO
    Posts
    187

    Default

    Can't we just register in a trust and add the whole family then? Much like an NFA item

  2. #2
    Guest
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Milliken, CO
    Posts
    1,421

    Default

    I would think so, I'm currently gettig ready to set up an NFA trust and all my firearms will be added to it along with a few selected people that are listed as trustees.

  3. #3
    Bang Bang Ridge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Cedar Park, TX
    Posts
    8,307

    Default


  4. #4
    Drives A Barbie Jeep Adawg38's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Arvada, CO
    Posts
    1,085

    Default

    Anyone heard of Feinstein Dickens Cider? Yeah, that's what that Ho needs!


    "I have a very strict gun control policy: if there's a gun around, I want to be in control of it."
    - Clint Eastwood

  5. #5
    Guest
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Milliken, CO
    Posts
    1,421

    Default

    Well the first reply to my email has come back. Senator Bennett
    Dear Shawn:
    Thank you for contacting me regarding Senator Feinstein's assault weapons ban proposal. I appreciate hearing from you.
    The numerous tragedies that our nation has had to face over the past year have been staggering. My own family, like all Americans, has been repeatedly shocked and deeply saddened by the violence we have witnessed, and my heart continues to be with the victims and their families. As Coloradans, we know how this type of tragedy can shake a community to its core and in the aftermath of these abhorrent acts our priority should be on supporting the survivors and families, and healing our communities.
    We must have a real discussion in this country about finding ways to stop these senseless shootings. I believe a combination of improved access to mental health services, restrictions on certain weapons intended for the battlefield, and elimination of the gun show loophole are sensible steps that can protect our communities and particularly, our children. In Colorado, we support the right to bear arms and the ability of people to recreate, hunt, and protect their homes, and we want to keep the wrong weapons out the hands of the wrong people. I believe our state can come together to have a civil discussion that addresses these issues and as the President's taskforce releases its recommendations to prevent and reduce gun violence, we will ensure that Colorado's voices are heard.
    Senator Dianne Feinstein of California plans to introduce a bill in the 113th Congress that will prohibit the sale, transfer, importation and manufacturing of assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition feeding devices. The ban will include 120 specifically-named firearms and will apply to large-capacity ammunition feeding devices capable of accepting more than 10 rounds. The bill will also require grandfathered weapons to be registered under the National Firearms Act and will include a background check of the owner and any future transferees. Although Senator Feinstein has not introduced the bill, she has indicated that she will do so at the start of the legislative session.
    I look forward to reviewing Senator Feinstein's proposal, along with others brought before Senate. Let us all continue to keep the communities affected by these tragic acts in our thoughts and prayers.

    I value the input of fellow Coloradans in considering the wide variety of important issues and legislative initiatives that come before the Senate. I hope you will continue to inform me of your thoughts and concerns.
    For more information about my priorities as a U.S. Senator, I invite you to visit my website at http://bennet.senate.gov/. Again, thank you for contacting me.

    Sincerely,

    Michael F. Bennet
    United States Senator

    But since the auto generated email system doesn't allow for reply guess what, no answer.

  6. #6
    Varmiteer losttrail's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Monument
    Posts
    619

    Default

    If this abomination appears to gain traction, we should have a sunset amendment stating that if there is another "mass shooting" involving more than two (2) victims where the perpetrator uses ANY item on the list, the entire act is null and void immediately.

  7. #7
    Machine Gunner thvigil11's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Miami, NM (Yeah, its a real place)
    Posts
    1,985

    Default

    Just reading through and saw this. No longer a shoulder thingy that goes up.

    15 ‘‘(38) The term ‘barrel shroud’—
    16 ‘‘(A) means a shroud that is attached to, or
    17 partially or completely encircles, the barrel of a fire18
    arm so that the shroud protects the user of the fire19
    arm from heat generated by the barrel; and
    20 ‘‘(B) does not include—
    21 ‘‘(i) a slide that partially or completely en22
    closes the barrel; or
    23 ‘‘(ii) an extension of the stock along the
    24 bottom of the barrel which does not encircle or
    25 substantially encircle the barrel.

    Is it just me or does this sound like a way to generally ensnare anything that has a handguard on it?

    Full text is here
    http://www.feinstein.senate.gov/publ...f-69e69f517fb4

    Nice list of the exempted firearms by name, (nice of them) I notice no pistols made the exempt list at all.

  8. #8
    Grand Master Know It All hatidua's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    boulder
    Posts
    4,099

    Default

    Although I find the entire bill absurd, why did a barrel shroud ever, even back in '94, make the list? I don't expect Feinstein to make sense or do anything based on logic or fact, but how does the presence, or absence, of a barrel shroud somehow make a shotgun more lethal?

  9. #9
    Escaped From New York zteknik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    6,269

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hatidua View Post
    Although I find the entire bill absurd, why did a barrel shroud ever, even back in '94, make the list? I don't expect Feinstein to make sense or do anything based on logic or fact, but how does the presence, or absence, of a barrel shroud somehow make a shotgun more lethal?
    In her twisted mind probably from some movies she saw they had them on the shotguns while on killing sprees...
    FHUGETABOUDIT!!!

  10. #10
    Machine Gunner Teufelhund's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Elizabeth
    Posts
    1,711

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hatidua View Post
    Although I find the entire bill absurd, why did a barrel shroud ever, even back in '94, make the list? I don't expect Feinstein to make sense or do anything based on logic or fact, but how does the presence, or absence, of a barrel shroud somehow make a shotgun more lethal?
    . . . or a flash hider, or a pistol grip, or a detachable magazine. The entire premise of this bill and its predecessor is ridiculous because all of these things are cosmetic and have zero impact on lethality. It's not supposed to make sense, it's just supposed to implement control.
    "America is at that awkward stage: It's too late to work within the system, and too early to shoot the bastards."
    -Claire Wolfe

    "I got a shotgun, rifle, and a four-wheel drive, and a country boy can survive."
    -Hank Williams Jr.

    Feedback

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •