I've been mulling this over for a few weeks now, figure this is as good of place to say it... I see all the "special treatment" for LEOs getting to keep guns and not being affected by any legislation. What about veterans? We're the ones who actually train, employ, and constantly use these "assault weapons"- yet I have yet to hear any lawmaker address this. Not saying if any law is passed they should include exemptions for LE and mil vets and eff everyone else, just asking why they are going to exclude active and retired LE but not active/retired (honorable) mil as well? I would think a discharged Marine is better equipped to safely possess and own an AR-15 than a retired Mesa County Sheriff's Deputy.

But still, Feinstein needs to be arrested and charged with treason. I won't hold my breath, but that's the law...