Close
Page 3 of 11 FirstFirst 12345678 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 108
  1. #21
    Guest
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Westminster, CO
    Posts
    2,741

    Default


  2. #22
    Paper Hunter mahkcod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    178

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BPTactical View Post
    ANY elected official who supports this legislation is WILLFULLY violating their Oath of Office.
    AMEN!!!!
    ?You know why there's a Second Amendment? In case the government fails to follow the first one.?
    Rush Limbaugh

  3. #23
    Grumpy Mountain Man crashdown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Tanaina Alaska
    Posts
    756

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aloha_Shooter View Post
    Yes, any gun with a DETACHABLE magazine can be fitted with a magazine that holds more rounds. The antis don't want you to have any guns anyway and would prefer you only have one shot if they have to allow you to have a gun at all so they don't see any contradiction.
    So this banning everything but black-powder, revolvers, breach loading guns, and guns with a mag tube that can't be modified to hold more than 5.
    Shouldn't the list of proposed guns be much longer?

  4. #24
    Gong Shooter mikedubs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    348

    Default

    It looks as if she threw everything including the kitchen sink in this bill. I wonder if it's like network TV: throw shit on the wall and see what sticks.

    BTW: Screw that noise!

  5. #25
    Plinker
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Highlands Ranch
    Posts
    58

    Default Feinstein Ban - Early report

    Quote Originally Posted by Dingo View Post
    ^^^^THIS^^^^ I'm not military, but I would trust any Marine I know with a so-called "assault weapon" a thousand times more than some of these wanna-be-cowboy LEO's I've met. (Not a blanket statement - just referring to the unfortunate impression I've formed from talking with most Denver/Boulder cops.)
    You are missing their point.
    ALL military are more likely then not mentally ill (why would they join up anyway) so they are in eligible...

  6. #26
    Machine Gunner Singlestack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Lafayette, Colorado
    Posts
    1,393

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ronin13 View Post
    I've been mulling this over for a few weeks now, figure this is as good of place to say it... I see all the "special treatment" for LEOs getting to keep guns and not being affected by any legislation. What about veterans? We're the ones who actually train, employ, and constantly use these "assault weapons"- yet I have yet to hear any lawmaker address this. Not saying if any law is passed they should include exemptions for LE and mil vets and eff everyone else, just asking why they are going to exclude active and retired LE but not active/retired (honorable) mil as well? I would think a discharged Marine is better equipped to safely possess and own an AR-15 than a retired Mesa County Sheriff's Deputy.

    But still, Feinstein needs to be arrested and charged with treason. I won't hold my breath, but that's the law...
    Because dems don't trust honorably discharged veterans. Recall the homeland security memos from a couple of years ago identifying high risk groups for domestic terrorism - returning veterans, preppers owning more than a 7 day supply of food,...?
    "Guilty of collusion"

  7. #27
    The "Godfather" of COAR Great-Kazoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Washboard Alley, AZ.
    Posts
    48,074

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lowbeyond View Post
    i aint complying with shit
    Repost!!!
    The Great Kazoo's Feedback

    "when you're happy you enjoy the melody but, when you're broken you understand the lyrics".

  8. #28
    Guest
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Milliken, CO
    Posts
    1,421

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by loveski View Post
    Good thing I have a strong right hand. Time to write more letters. Everyone needs to contact their reps and senators again

    Yeap, I've just drafted a new one, a little lenghty but I think it gets the point across. Tell me what you guys think of it.

    Dear Representative/Senator:

    I will start this letter with a simple question. How will you vote?

    With today’s introduction of Senator Feinstein’s “Assault Weapon Ban” bill in the Senate, I’ve been compelled to again write and express my deep concern for the future of our constitutional republic. Yes I said constitutional republic, the United States of America is not and never has been, a democracy. I do not state that as an insult to your intelligence but I find it necessary to remind everyone of that every now and then, especially when usurpations of the constitution are being considered with any seriousness.

    The Constitution of the United States of America is the document that controls what the federal government can and cannot do, and how they are to do it. Yet again another legislator has proposed ignoring it and further degrading its principles. Senator Feinstein by introducing this bill has willfully disregarded her oath of office yet again. Not that this is some earth shattering revelation, and it’s obviously not the first time it’s happened nor will it be the last. However it is a very disturbing trend that is ever increasing in frequency.

    I write to remind you of the oath you took to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America. Not inpart, but in its entirety. The world is watching what our elected representatives do in times like these and it is no time to back down and compromise on the Constitution. I suggest that if Senator Feinstein wishes to circumvent the 2nd Amendment that she at least has the courage to go about it in the proper way and propose a constitutional amendment. That is not to say that I would support such an endeavor, but she would at least have my respect for doing it the right way. She contends that she has the backing of “the people” and that 2nd Amendment supporters are the few or the fringe of this country. Well I challenge her to prove it, go about the amendment process and whatever comes of it, comes.

    I could go on with lengthy explanations citing historical documents like the Militia Act, and the Constitution, but it’s a waste of my time and yours as you both know and understand them or you do not, and my explanation will most likely make no difference. So I won’t do that. What I will do is pose the question one more time, but please know this before you answer. I will make my decision on how to proceed from here based solely on your answer. This includes how I will vote in coming elections but does not even begin to encompass what I will do. Please know that anyone who votes for Senator Feinstein’s bill should it make it before your legislative body in ANY form will become the focus of my efforts. These efforts will begin with but not be limited to:

    • Voting
    • Supporting opposing candidates in election efforts.
    • Actively campaigning for or against candidates
    • Financial donations to campaign efforts


    I don’t need a lengthy explanation of your position for your vote all I need is a one word answer, Yes or No, that is all I need to know. So here it is again.

    If/when Senator Feinstein’s “Assault Weapons Ban” bill comes before you , How will you vote?

    Sincerely,

  9. #29
    Sig Fantastic Ronin13's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Arvada, CO
    Posts
    10,268

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Singlestack View Post
    Because dems don't trust honorably discharged veterans. Recall the homeland security memos from a couple of years ago identifying high risk groups for domestic terrorism - returning veterans, preppers owning more than a 7 day supply of food,...?
    Ooops. my fault. I completely forgot about that, and I'm using that silly logic again! Please don't tell Jim!
    Quote Originally Posted by XC700116 View Post
    Yeap, I've just drafted a new one, a little lenghty but I think it gets the point across. Tell me what you guys think of it.
    You were at the Rally last weekend, weren't you? Holbert's advice was good!
    "There is no news in the truth, and no truth in the news."
    "The revolution will not be televised... Instead it will be filmed from multiple angles via cell phone cameras, promptly uploaded to YouTube, Tweeted about, and then shared on Facebook, pending a Wi-Fi connection."

  10. #30
    Guest
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NORFOLK, Virginia :(
    Posts
    602

    Default

    She knows that bill is DOA when it gets to the House. Pure grandstanding on her pet issue. It's the "compromise" bill that has me worried.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •