Close
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 39 of 39

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Possesses Antidote for "Cool" Gman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Puyallup, WA
    Posts
    17,848

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Slapps74 View Post
    I think that this quote from that Feinstein should be of more concern because its what I think they are up to,

    "No weapon is taken from anyone,” said Feinstein. “The purpose is to dry up the supply of these weapons



    Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/2...#ixzz2IxGGLGW8
    Wrong thread. Been there, done that, got the T-shirt.
    Liberals never met a slippery slope they didn't grease.
    -Me

    I wish technology solved people issues. It seems to just reveal them.
    -Also Me


  2. #2
    Guest
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Thornton
    Posts
    600

    Default

    Yea just found that one. Removed it

  3. #3
    Possesses Antidote for "Cool" Gman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Puyallup, WA
    Posts
    17,848

    Default Re: Anyone else see the RMGO post on FB about the NRA being a sell out?

    Quote Originally Posted by MED View Post
    I do not have a problem with strengthening the background check system. Personally, I would really like to use a state background check on a private sale especially if no FFL was involved. I do a pretty thorough background check every time I lease my rental property.
    That's because you still own the asset. When you sell an asset, you sever any responsibility for what the new owner does with it.

    There's no parallel here.

    Sent from my tactical android.
    Liberals never met a slippery slope they didn't grease.
    -Me

    I wish technology solved people issues. It seems to just reveal them.
    -Also Me


  4. #4
    Machine Gunner
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Conifer
    Posts
    1,473

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gman View Post
    That's because you still own the asset. When you sell an asset, you sever any responsibility for what the new owner does with it.

    There's no parallel here.

    Sent from my tactical android.
    Only that I do care about what happens when it leaves my possession. In all my actions that have consequences, (I don't think to myself...not my problem so I don't give a shit) Its more about due diligence.

    The last time I leased my house, I caught a potential person that was convicted for fraud. ...so, this only matters if I have something to lose?

    If I were selling one of my firearms to somebody that was stopped by a felony history or mental health hold, I find that valuable whether it was my problem or not. My wife's X husband was convicted for beating her and menacing with a firearm. Would you want to be the guy who supplied him with a firearm to do worse? I agree that any person intent on doing harm will do harm, but I do not want to be the person to enable it.
    Last edited by MED; 01-25-2013 at 15:55.
    I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.
    Thomas Jefferson

    Feedback

  5. #5
    Possesses Antidote for "Cool" Gman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Puyallup, WA
    Posts
    17,848

    Default

    If you have a problem selling a firearm to an individual, don't do it. Your problem is solved. At some point you have to mind your own business.
    Liberals never met a slippery slope they didn't grease.
    -Me

    I wish technology solved people issues. It seems to just reveal them.
    -Also Me


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •