Quote Originally Posted by BPTactical View Post
I would not pay extra taxes for the simple fact they would be pirated and never used as intended.

You seem to have missed the point.
Just what the hell makes ANY childs life any more or less important than any other child?
Rich child, poor child.
Black child, white child.
Citizen child or non-citizen child.
Makes no difference.
A childs life is a child's life and they all deserve a safe environment in which to learn.
I don't feel any child's life is worth more than any other. I awas looking at it from a National Security point of view of what could happen if his kids are not protected. In the same manner they protect the Pilots with door locks and not allowing you to approach the bathroom on a plane while the Pilot is out, so no one can take the plane over and crash it into a building. The Pilot doesn't have any more right to the bathroom than I do.

I also agree strongly that any child deserves a safe place to learn and no one deserves one more.

Someone thought this was my original point and its not. I used it as an example of the current campaign being used. Its works for you and many on here. My point is the campaign needs to be targeted for those that are not clearly in this corner and can be convinced to move to this side. I am with you man, not against you. My kids deserve the same treatment as the Presidents. My kids deserve and I expect them to have a safe environment to learn in.

The point is the campaign. Maybe I don't understand and the target for the NRAs campaign are the NRA members. If so then this entire thread was a waste of bits. If not, then yes use the argument about they have guarded schools while being against it at the same time. Many will see the Presidents kids (not more valuable) in a different light because of National Security and that defused the point of guards in school because the whole discussion became about the Presidents kids and why or why not they should be protected