Close
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17
  1. #11
    Ammocurious Rucker61's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO, USA
    Posts
    3,359

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teufelhund View Post
    18 U.S.C. 1918:
    “Whoever violates the provisions of section 7311 of title 5 that an individual may not accept or hold a position in the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia if he (1) advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government [and] shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year and a day or both.”

    So when do we get to go remove them? Who's driving?
    So if anyone proposes any changes to the Constitution, that's the same as advocating the overthrow of the constitutional form of our government? How would you view the initiators of the PATRIOT ACT, then, in view of its impact on the 4th Amendment?

  2. #12
    Machine Gunner Teufelhund's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Elizabeth
    Posts
    1,711

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rucker61 View Post
    So if anyone proposes any changes to the Constitution, that's the same as advocating the overthrow of the constitutional form of our government? How would you view the initiators of the PATRIOT ACT, then, in view of its impact on the 4th Amendment?
    Sorry, I wasn't serious. There are actually provisions in place which grant members of Congress immunity from being arrested or charged with violation of their oath of office while in session. I don't have the specific reference handy, but I'll try to track it down.

    ETA: Here it is:

    Congressional immunity refers to a special immunity that is granted to members of Congress. The following are the exemptions granted to the members of Congress under congressional immunity :

    1. A Congress member is exempted from arrest while attending a session of the body to which the member belongs, excluding an arrest for treason, breach of the peace, or a felony, or;
    2.A Congress member is exempted from arrest or interrogation for any speech or debate entered into during a legislative session.
    In In re Grand Jury, 821 F.2d 946 (3d Cir. Pa. 1987), it was held that congressional immunity is an evidentiary privilege that is applied broadly to evidence or testimony about all acts that occur in the regular course of the legislative process. It therefore applies to activity taken in the course of legislative fact-finding.
    Last edited by Teufelhund; 01-30-2013 at 15:22. Reason: edited for accuracy
    "America is at that awkward stage: It's too late to work within the system, and too early to shoot the bastards."
    -Claire Wolfe

    "I got a shotgun, rifle, and a four-wheel drive, and a country boy can survive."
    -Hank Williams Jr.

    Feedback

  3. #13
    Machine Gunner Teufelhund's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Elizabeth
    Posts
    1,711

    Default

    Here's a better description of Congressional Immunity:

    http://legal-dictionary.thefreedicti...ional+immunity
    "America is at that awkward stage: It's too late to work within the system, and too early to shoot the bastards."
    -Claire Wolfe

    "I got a shotgun, rifle, and a four-wheel drive, and a country boy can survive."
    -Hank Williams Jr.

    Feedback

  4. #14
    Ammocurious Rucker61's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO, USA
    Posts
    3,359

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teufelhund View Post
    Sorry, I wasn't serious. There are actually provisions in place which grant members of Congress immunity from being arrested or charged with violation of their oath of office while in session. I don't have the specific reference handy, but I'll try to track it down.
    Piffle. You need to give the high sign or something when you're kidding. Looks like my filter is clogged or summint.

  5. #15
    Machine Gunner Teufelhund's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Elizabeth
    Posts
    1,711

    Default

    lol sorry. I'll throw in a wink wink, nod nod, say no more, say no more next time.
    "America is at that awkward stage: It's too late to work within the system, and too early to shoot the bastards."
    -Claire Wolfe

    "I got a shotgun, rifle, and a four-wheel drive, and a country boy can survive."
    -Hank Williams Jr.

    Feedback

  6. #16
    Guest
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Centennial
    Posts
    395

    Default

    The Bill Of Rights isn't anything that was "granted" it was set up to prevent the state from infringing on our natural rights of liberty and property. So by compromising the Second Amendment these tyrants are saying that our natural rights are not fully protected. Since they've been chipping away at the 1st, 2nd, and 4th Amendments for years, it makes sense that disarming the citizenry. Especially those that are awake enough to care that their natural rights have been infringed upon. If they hate the Second Amendment so much, there is a legal way to amend the constitution, but why bother with that.
    Last edited by Cthulhu; 01-30-2013 at 15:55.

  7. #17
    Varmiteer two shoes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    705

    Default

    Should all be tried for treason:
    52 cosponsors (52D) (show)
    Bishop, Timothy [D-NY1]
    Blumenauer, Earl [D-OR3]
    Brady, Robert [D-PA1]
    Carney, John [D-DE0]
    Cartwright, Matthew [D-PA17]
    Cicilline, David [D-RI1]
    Cohen, Steve [D-TN9]
    Conyers, John [D-MI13]
    DeGette, Diana [D-CO1]
    DeLauro, Rosa [D-CT3]
    Deutch, Theodore [D-FL21]
    Eshoo, Anna [D-CA18]
    Esty, Elizabeth [D-CT5]
    Frankel, Lois [D-FL22]
    Grijalva, Raúl [D-AZ3]
    Hahn, Janice [D-CA44]
    Himes, James [D-CT4]
    Holt, Rush [D-NJ12]
    Huffman, Jared [D-CA2]
    Jackson Lee, Sheila [D-TX18]
    Kennedy, Joseph [D-MA4]
    Larson, John [D-CT1]
    Levin, Sander [D-MI9]
    Lofgren, Zoe [D-CA19]
    Lowenthal, Alan [D-CA47]
    Lowey, Nita [D-NY17]
    Maloney, Carolyn [D-NY12]
    Matsui, Doris [D-CA6]
    McCollum, Betty [D-MN4]
    McGovern, James “Jim” [D-MA2]
    Meeks, Gregory [D-NY5]
    Meng, Grace [D-NY6]
    Miller, George [D-CA11]
    Moran, James “Jim” [D-VA8]
    Nadler, Jerrold [D-NY10]
    Pallone, Frank [D-NJ6]
    Pascrell, Bill [D-NJ9]
    Perlmutter, Ed [D-CO7]
    Quigley, Mike [D-IL5]
    Schakowsky, Janice “Jan” [D-IL9]
    Schiff, Adam [D-CA28]
    Scott, Robert “Bobby” [D-VA3]
    Serrano, José [D-NY15]
    Sherman, Brad [D-CA30]
    Sires, Albio [D-NJ8]
    Slaughter, Louise [D-NY25]
    Speier, Jackie [D-CA14]
    Swalwell, Eric [D-CA15]
    Takano, Mark [D-CA41]
    Tierney, John [D-MA6]
    Tsongas, Niki [D-MA3]
    Van Hollen, Chris [D-MD8]
    -two shoes
    _____________________________________________
    The Food Stamp Program, administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, is proud to be distributing the greatest amount of free meals and food stamps ever. Meanwhile, the National Park Service, administered by the U.S. Department of the Interior, asks us to ‘Please Do Not Feed the Animals'. Their stated reason for the policy is because the animals will grow dependent on handouts and will not learn to take care of themselves.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •