Nope. From the way the way the thread reads, this law is asking for mandatory sentencing for people who are charged. Have there been cases where someone is charged, but not sentenced?
Guy Dues is talking about sounds like a real POS, but it still sounds like he was sentenced.
"There are no finger prints under water."
We don't need more laws. In fact I think we need less BS laws HOWEVER, I think we need to have harsher punishments for the laws on the books. This is a case were I think the minimum sentence needs to be VERY HIGH.
The revolving door needs to be stopped and prison should not be club med. It should be about making small rocks from big rocks and it should be a very long time for people who commit these types of crimes OR other violent crimes.
"The thing about quotes on the internet is that you cannot confirm their validity." -Abraham Lincoln
Wrong. The bill reads:
You can't sentence people to jail time who are charged but not convicted no matter what crime they are charged with. This law simply asks for a harsher punishment for violating CURRENT law.CONCERNING MANDATORY SENTENCING PROVISIONS FOR A
DEFENDANT CONVICTED OF A SEX OFFENSE AGAINST A CHILD
WHO IS FOURTEEN YEARS OF AGE OR YOUNGER.
It asked that criminals convicted of sex crimes on children get a mandatory minimum sentence of 25 years. As a father, I would be surprised if you didn't support that. I don't know what the current minimum sentence is (if there is one) but the more the better when it comes to this crime.
So again, these so-called Representatives have voted "yes" on a bill that would limit the rights of law abiding gun owners to "protect the kids" however they vote "no" on a bill that would actually protect the kids from proven child rapists by locking them up longer. How does that make sense?
Last edited by hollohas; 02-14-2013 at 20:00.
Excuse me. Convicted was definitely the word I was looking for. So, are there instances where people convicted of a sex offense against a child who is fourteen or under, are NOT sentenced?
Is this law asking for mandatory sentencing, or higher penalties? I'm okay with increasing penalties by changing current law.
"There are no finger prints under water."
Yes, this bill only asked to revise current Colorado Revised Statutes regarding sex crimes so that the minimum sentence was harsher. Currently the minimum are as low as 2 years.
I don't know about Colorado but there have been many instances of criminals convicted of sex crimes, that were only given probation or very short jail terms, who went on to hurt kids again. That is why 44 states have some version of this so-called Jessica's law that requires a steep minimum sentence for child sex crimes.
After clarification, I'm on bored.
"There are no finger prints under water."