Am I required to read it before voting for it?
Am I required to read it before voting for it?
"There are no finger prints under water."
Love it! You've got my signature!
My Feedback
"When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law." -Frederic Bastiat
"I am a conservative. Quite possibly I am on the losing side; often I think so. Yet, out of a curious perversity I had rather lose with Socrates, let us say, than win with Lenin."
― Russell Kirk, Author of The Conservative Mind
^^^ Man that would be nice! Glad Zundfolge wrote that up! Sure beats the; "let's pack up and run crowd!" But they will be gone shortly- THANK GOD!
Last edited by 10mm-man; 02-19-2013 at 23:22.
I am in
I like the simplicity of this. Would this ballot rescind the requirement to conduct a background check at gun shows? If so, would you intend for that result to be highlighted by the language of the ballot?
"There are no finger prints under water."
Looks very good at first glance.
An important question is how it applies to existing Colorado law regarding firearms. This seems like it would repeal (or lead to repeal of) current state laws such as gun show background checks. What about the current Denver 20-round magazine ban, Denver ban on open carry, etc.?
Two part question:
-is it the intent of the proposed amendment to repeal all current laws on firearms?
-if not, how are current laws "grandfathered" in?
Other current laws include the concealed carry law. Is that a restriction on 2A rights? Constitutional Carry supporters would say it is.
So at first glance, you're on the right track, but I think we have some issues to iron out.