Close
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Industry Partner BPTactical's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    North Metro
    Posts
    13,914

    Default Listening to Micheal Brown yesterday...........

    And he came up with an interesting point. It seems that the Department of Labor and another .gov entity did some investigation on pre-employment back ground checks. It seems they have discovered that they are discriminatory and possibly unlawful. Although he did not divulge the exact numbers he stated that the majority of people declined employment because of failing a background check were minorities.

    Background checks were racist.
    Now I am not sure but I do not believe employment is a right however the RTKBA is.

    Racist and discriminatory to have to undergo a BGC to practice your RTKBA?

    Interesting point.
    The most important thing to be learned from those who demand "Equality For All" is that all are not equal...

    Gun Control - seeking a Hardware solution for a Software problem...

  2. #2
    Machine Gunner sabot_round's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Killeen, TX
    Posts
    2,185

    Default

    Well go figure!!! The left is living to their word. IMHO The left is living up to their worst!!
    You can't polish a turd!!
    Quote Originally Posted by CAR-AR-M16 View Post
    I want to get some pics of Rod shooting a 1911 since we all know how much he likes them.
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    MY FEEDBACK

  3. #3
    The "Godfather" of COAR Great-Kazoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Washboard Alley, AZ.
    Posts
    48,077

    Default

    If i have to pass a drug screening, everyone needs to pass a BG check.
    Last edited by Great-Kazoo; 02-22-2013 at 20:17.
    The Great Kazoo's Feedback

    "when you're happy you enjoy the melody but, when you're broken you understand the lyrics".

  4. #4
    Guest
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    North Denver area,Colorado
    Posts
    525

    Default

    EEOC comes out with a bunch of goofy shit on a regular basis. The problem for them is, "Disparate impact" as a form of employment discrimination, in the absence of discriminatory intent, is a bitch to prove. Especially since so many of the things with a supposed "disparate impact" are still legitimate legal reasons to discriminate, or "Bona-Fide Occupational Qualifications" in the legalese: not hiring bus drivers with DUI convictions, for instance. That may or may not have a disparate impact on minorities (I have no idea) but it's a pretty reasonable reason to not hire someone for a driving job. Or crappy credit with gambling debts for someone who handles cash. Or someone with no arms to be a bouncer at a strip club.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •