While I understand the sentiment behind this post, it's just another "wimmin need to be kept in the kitchin, get me a SAMMICH!" platitude. That's BS.

Our society has swung too far into the "think of the children (and every other group that can be a ready vitim for my agenda!)" and it's starting to cannibalize the foundations of our country. But when an article above paints women with the same brush as Andrea Dworkin, sprinkled with a light dose of misogyny and suggests that "estrogen" in the water is the cause of the decay of our society's moral fiber, I'd like to shovel a nice deep layer of this crap onto my garden's foundations. Men and women have differences, yup. Women aren't born with a "LIBERAL" stamp on their forehead. I served my country, dammit. I like to shoot guns, I like movies with explosions and heroes, I eat meat, I protect and care for my family and my neighbors, John Wayne and Ronald Reagan's photos grace our walls and I'll be DAMNED if some self-professed shrimpy egghead that thinks about math all day tries to put me back into a corner because his panties are in a bunch about something and he needs someone to blame. I remember back in the 70s, my mom had to have my dad's permission to withdraw a specific amount of money from their joint checking account! What, freedom is only good for men, and not women?

There is no way in HELL that going back to those "good old manly-man" days are going to make things better. Nor are they going to happen, because I will kick the ass of any Y chromosome-carrying person that would try to take my freedoms away, either physically or by bull$hit justifications like the above article. Where is the difference in theory between "all semi-automatic guns are bad" and "today's men are acting like women. And that's bad!" attitude? I say we join forces, find a way where our differences are considered strengths and take our freedoms back from those that would de-fang us. We're in this together, whether egghead likes it or not.

Whooo. How'd that soapbox get there?