Close
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    The Red Belly TheBelly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Leavenworth, KS
    Posts
    6,057
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default GEN Odierno on assault weapons

    http://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_s...n-control.html

    apparently, the Army CoS made comments regarding sequestration and gun control.

    I won't comment, but I thought I'd open this for the general populace:

    should Active Duty service members make comments such as those in the brief article?
    Just doing what I can to stay on this side of the dirt.

  2. #2
    Varmiteer
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Eastern Wyoming
    Posts
    574

    Default

    i tried to get out of the article what his thoughts were, but I couldnt. he shouldnt have been able to go on that kind of program as an AD person. but, if he is agreeing with civilian gun control, then it reinforces what I have been saying. military wont neccesarily side with US. they will do what they are told in many instances.

  3. #3
    Looking Elsewhere
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    The Peoples Republic (Boulder)
    Posts
    3,146

    Default

    The Army field manual specifically states that civilian disarmament is one of the 1st things you need to do when you occupy any territory.. Why would anyone think that Army Brass would think any differently?

  4. #4
    High Power Shooter jslo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Littleton
    Posts
    827

    Default edit: proposals not bills

    Watched it this morning and he did say he, personally, favors the bills and went one step further by stating he favors registration, at least for service members.
    Last edited by jslo; 03-01-2013 at 11:40.

  5. #5
    Grand Master Know It All sellersm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Montrose
    Posts
    4,999

    Default

    I'm not .mil so I'm sure I have a misunderstanding (or two), but aren't people in these positions basically 'appointed' to be there? So I'd assume that they'd be "on board" with the policies of those that helped them get where they are...? History tells me, if nothing else does, that the higher the position, the less likely they can be trusted to be defenders/enforcers of OUR freedoms!?

    Ok, now back to something I know a little about.... customizing CRM for my employer....
    Last edited by sellersm; 03-01-2013 at 11:45. Reason: added 'defenders'
    http://disciplejourney.com

    Make men large and strong and tyranny will bankrupt itself in making shackles for them.” – Rev. Henry Ward Beecher (1813-1887) US Abolitionist Preacher

    CIPCIP

  6. #6
    Machine Gunner
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    1,908

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by def90 View Post
    The Army field manual specifically states that civilian disarmament is one of the 1st things you need to do when you occupy any territory.. Why would anyone think that Army Brass would think any differently?
    The Brass usually aren't real soldiers. Half the guys above the rank of Captain are privileged frat boys not much different from a politician. If they haven't got a tab on their arm they should not be commanding combat troops . . . especially if they are "leading" from a fortified bunker far from the front lines.

  7. #7
    Guest
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NORFOLK, Virginia :(
    Posts
    602

    Default

    Not surprising. He was appointed to post by Obama. Army is weird sometimes - there have been several post commanders that have tried ridiculous things like telling soldiers that live off post they can't CCW or keep guns in their house.

  8. #8
    Machine Gunner Fmedges's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Plymouth, MN
    Posts
    1,062

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheBelly View Post
    http://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_s...n-control.html

    apparently, the Army CoS made comments regarding sequestration and gun control.

    I won't comment, but I thought I'd open this for the general populace:

    should Active Duty service members make comments such as those in the brief article?
    No

    USMC 2000-2004, OIF

  9. #9
    Paper Hunter
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    184

    Default

    They shouldn't comment as a member of the military. If they do comment, it should be as a private citizen. However, in this day and age, posting something on FB or a public forum that can be tied back to you can still get your ass fired or NJP'd... so a wise person will keep their mouth shut in a print form.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •