Close
Results 1 to 10 of 251

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Machine Gunner
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    1,907

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SuperiorDG View Post
    I saw this come up when they were having the hearings on the pay for background checks. They don't run back ground checks for public officials because it is unconstitutional. Yes they have a right to serve and don't have to prove they are not criminals.
    ALL public officials should be required to pass a background check AND be subject to random drug tests . . . otherwise, what is the point of background checks and drug tests? Everyone from Wal*Mart to RTD is subject to mandatory testing, so why should those elected officials empowered and entrusted to change the law of the land be treated any different? After all, they are allegedly "public servants" who work for the people, right?

  2. #2
    I'm a dude, I swear! SuperiorDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    CCC / Golden
    Posts
    3,070

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Clint45 View Post
    ALL public officials should be required to pass a background check AND be subject to random drug tests . . . otherwise, what is the point of background checks and drug tests? Everyone from Wal*Mart to RTD is subject to mandatory testing, so why should those elected officials empowered and entrusted to change the law of the land be treated any different? After all, they are allegedly "public servants" who work for the people, right?
    Working at Walmart is not a Constitutional Right. Just saying.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •