Doesn't the bill have to be re-passed in the House before going to the Governor because of the amendments?
(Not that I expect the outcome to be any different.)
Doesn't the bill have to be re-passed in the House before going to the Governor because of the amendments?
(Not that I expect the outcome to be any different.)
RATATATATATATATATATATABLAM
If there's nothing wrong with having to show an ID to buy a gun, there's nothing wrong with having to show an ID to vote.
For legal reasons, that's a joke.
This is the bill that says the best defense against the hollow men is the hope that the sheepdogs aren't in the first fifteen people shot.
In other words the Democrats are willing to sacrifice 15 people in the hope that there is a sheepdog.
Last edited by Rucker61; 03-11-2013 at 17:37.
Te occidere possunt sed te edere non possunt nefas est
Sane person with a better sight picture
OK. I recommend someone who can break down what passed and a gist of 9 and 4 in a new thread, that would be really helpful. This is 117 pages long.
Just one thread. Who knows the bills the best? Figure that out and have them go for it.
Mom's comin' 'round to put it back the way it ought to be.
Anyone that thinks war is good is ignorant. Anyone that thinks war isn't needed is stupid.
--J
My Feedback
"Praise be to our prophet, John Moses Browning, who hath bestowed upon us the new testament of shooting. Delivered unto us, his disciples, on 29 March 1911 A.D."
Way to lose Colorado Jobs.
Since you know everyone has no problem finding those.
GunGrabenlooper already said he was signing it if they send it to him.
Hickenlooper has nothing to lose by signing ALL of these into law. Bloomberg has already whispered in Hick's ear about needing a VP running mate for when he runs for president. The seed has been planted. In a couple of years... Hick will be hitting the campaign trails again. He doesn't care one bit about the threat of us voting him out of office.