Delete-wrong thread
Delete-wrong thread
Last edited by muddywings; 03-08-2013 at 19:59.
"The thing about quotes on the internet is that you cannot confirm their validity." -Abraham Lincoln
Denver is going to grab all 15+ mags charge you and make you sue to get them back, just watch. For a the burden to be on a prosecutor, there has to be something in evidence and charges pending or contemplated. All that means is that there is something in evidence locker.
The question for me is if you are a Denver resident and the DPD finds you with 15+ round mags, can they just based on that get a search warrant for your car and house to hunt for potentially illegal mags???
I'll stop buying black rifles when my wife stops buying black shoes.
shows picts of guns lined up waiting for BCG at a gun store
says this is becasue there was a rash of government breaking into their constitution ha
Oh no! So I should decline my kick ass job offer? Tell my family that we should go ahead and be furloughed because the POTUS says so? I'll cancel all my arrangements right now! </sarcasm>
But, really, even with the current legislation being discussed, it's not as bad as CA. That's not an excuse, these bills are BS. BTW, why are the people that are representatives allowed to not hang around and listen? They're wondering around and having side conversations instead of doing their job.
I resume, all bills passed?
Bilingual NRA Pistol and Reloading Instructor, Chief Range Safety Officer Si necesitas un instructor de la NRA de Pistola en EspaƱol para aplicar para el permiso de Conceal Carry (CCW) estoy disponible para ayudarte.
On the first paragraph, a lot of PD's here in CA do the same. Fortunately, many PD's are educated enough to understand. Don't get caught with a magazine specifically for a gun that is obviously a new model, which in my case is a Sig SP2022.
The second paragraph, if they can do an illegal search and seizure based on just owning magazines with an unknown purchase date, there will be some cases going to the Supreme Court. I'm hoping any bills that pass go to that route and get overturned.
I wish he wouldn't have said that .308 & .30-06 was more dangerous. He is just giving them their next target imo.
anyone else think this guy now is rambling a bit?
He's really just been rambling the whole time. His statement doesn't help this bill at all other than that anyone can just go out of state and sell whatever they want and get whatever they want.
They need to be discussing the flaws in statistics, the factual statistics, actual numbers that will be affected by these companies leaving. Dems don't care about these firearms equipment suppliers. 10 new IT startups will likely replace them when they leave..
Last edited by UnoTaco; 03-08-2013 at 20:06.