Close
Page 87 of 125 FirstFirst ... 3777828384858687888990919297 ... LastLast
Results 861 to 870 of 1243
  1. #861
    Guest
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Milliken, CO
    Posts
    1,421

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by th3w01f View Post
    OK, that really makes things a mess since I'm waiting on 2 NFA items that will not be here before 7/1.
    Honestly, I'd talk to a lawyer. Here's what I'm kinda thinking, either create a second trust for everything not NFA and move it there now with their names on it, and then use your current one for the new items and remove their names from it with say just your wifes on it (so she'll pass the BGC) and then when they are old enough add them as trustees. Granted if you both are killed in a plane crash the NFA stuff is lost, but it might be the best work around for now.

    But here's the question and some here may be able to answer it, currently, do you have to do a CBI BGC/4473 on NFA items, once you're approved by ATF?

    I haven't actually gone through the process yet as I was waiting for this shit to get sorted out before hand as I didn't want to get hung up in the middle of the process with a law change.
    Last edited by XC700116; 03-11-2013 at 13:50.

  2. #862
    Guest
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Frederick
    Posts
    311

    Default

    I'm still confused on a lot of the ins and outs of these bills. Can someone explain to me why one or many firearms that were purchased by me and/or my wife can't be considered OUR firearms? She and I can BOTH own a particular vehicle. Is the only reason we can't BOTH own a particular firearm simply the fact that we don't register/title firearms?

    Not that I'm looking for titling or registration... just curious is all.

  3. #863
    Machine Gunner th3w01f's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Castle Rock, CO
    Posts
    1,626

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by XC700116 View Post
    Honestly, I'd talk to a lawyer. Here's what I'm kinda thinking, either create a second trust for everything not NFA and move it there now with their names on it, and then use your current one for the new items and remove their names from it with say just your wifes on it (so she'll pass the BGC) and then when they are old enough add them as trustees. Granted if you both are killed in a plane crash the NFA stuff is lost, but it might be the best work around for now.
    Emails already off to NFATrustguy.

  4. #864
    Varmiteer losttrail's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Monument
    Posts
    619

    Default

    Better yet, move out of this Marxist controlled state.

  5. #865

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brobar View Post
    I'm still confused on a lot of the ins and outs of these bills. Can someone explain to me why one or many firearms that were purchased by me and/or my wife can't be considered OUR firearms? She and I can BOTH own a particular vehicle. Is the only reason we can't BOTH own a particular firearm simply the fact that we don't register/title firearms?

    Not that I'm looking for titling or registration... just curious is all.
    And therein lies the problem with this madness! Try and define ownership in the context of this proposed legislation, without the use of some form of registration.
    http://disciplejourney.com

    Make men large and strong and tyranny will bankrupt itself in making shackles for them.” – Rev. Henry Ward Beecher (1813-1887) US Abolitionist Preacher

    CIPCIP

  6. #866
    Possesses Antidote for "Cool" Gman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Puyallup, WA
    Posts
    17,848

    Default

    I can buy a gun for my wife without her having to have a BGC. We're treated as a single legal entity. We have common property.

    This sounds like a liberal mess....but that statement is redundant.
    Liberals never met a slippery slope they didn't grease.
    -Me

    I wish technology solved people issues. It seems to just reveal them.
    -Also Me


  7. #867
    Gong Shooter colo-pr's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    402

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brobar View Post
    I'm still confused on a lot of the ins and outs of these bills. Can someone explain to me why one or many firearms that were purchased by me and/or my wife can't be considered OUR firearms? She and I can BOTH own a particular vehicle. Is the only reason we can't BOTH own a particular firearm simply the fact that we don't register/title firearms?

    Not that I'm looking for titling or registration... just curious is all.
    The Gun Registration is in the corner my friend, the ONLY WAY to enforce this is with GUN REGISTRATION.

  8. #868
    Ammocurious Rucker61's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO, USA
    Posts
    3,359

    Default

    I'm going to form an anarcho-syndicalist commune with all my friends, family and members here with joint ownership of all firearms. We can take it in turns to be a sort of executive officer for the week...
    Te occidere possunt sed te edere non possunt nefas est

    Sane person with a better sight picture

  9. #869
    MODFATHER cstone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    7,472

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rucker61 View Post
    I'm going to form an anarcho-syndicalist commune with all my friends, family and members here with joint ownership of all firearms. We can take it in turns to be a sort of executive officer for the week...
    Come see the oppression inherent in the system.

    I see what you did there.
    Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges.

    My Feedback

  10. #870
    Guest
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Milliken, CO
    Posts
    1,421

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brobar View Post
    I'm still confused on a lot of the ins and outs of these bills. Can someone explain to me why one or many firearms that were purchased by me and/or my wife can't be considered OUR firearms? She and I can BOTH own a particular vehicle. Is the only reason we can't BOTH own a particular firearm simply the fact that we don't register/title firearms?

    Not that I'm looking for titling or registration... just curious is all.

    The idea is that you could potentially pass and her fail a BGC or the other way around. For instance I know a guy who has a felony on his record, and his wife is a deputy, she can buy/own but he cannot, and she must keep her duty weapon (and any others) locked up without his access to be legal. It's stupid, but it's also unfortunately reality.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •