SENATE'S GUN CONTROL READING * LIVE

[mtnhack]

Where is Marble's bombshell?

[buckshotbarlow]

FUCKING ASSHOLES, all of those damn 'eye' votes....don't call me to protect you!

[buckshotbarlow]

glock most popular?

[neversummer900]

Here we go this is the knuckle buster. This is where good men&women will stand up or they will lay down and let freedom die.

[wctriumph]

OK, so say I get a job that takes me away from home for a week. My wife is disabled and has her State of Colorado issued MMJ license and so is not allowed to own a gun under federal law but I am unclear if she is allowed to own a gun under state law (can I gift her a gun?). She can't get a CCW permit because of this and she can't pass a back ground check to purchase a gun unless she lies which is a federal felony. If she picks up one of my guns to protect herself she breaks the law, potentially both federal and state. She has two of her own guns so she wouldn't have to use one of mine but ... my head hurts.

We are so fucked

[Rucker61]

I really like this guy.

[brobar]

The idea is that you could potentially pass and her fail a BGC or the other way around. For instance I know a guy who has a felony on his record, and his wife is a deputy, she can buy/own but he cannot, and she must keep her duty weapon (and any others) locked up without his access to be legal. It's stupid, but it's also unfortunately reality.

True... but I'm still allowed to GIFT her that firearm without a background check with the potentiality that she could still fail a BGC. Another reason why I find this whole thing odd. The only way I can think around this unenforceable nonsense is for both of us to sign and date an affidavit stating that I transfer all of my firearms to her (so she can show that if she ever was questioned while using my firearm) and vice-versa. Obviously... we would need to never show those documents at the same time, because they would be contradicting. But would anything stop us from doing that so long as nobody ever saw either document at the same time?

[Katastrophic]

That's it, he made entirely too logical of a point.... it'll pass.

[XC700116]

True... but I'm still allowed to GIFT her that firearm without a background check with the potentiality that she could still fail a BGC. Another reason why I find this whole thing odd. The only way I can think around this unenforceable nonsense is for both of us to sign and date an affidavit stating that I transfer all of my firearms to her (so she can show that if she ever was questioned while using my firearm) and vice-versa. Obviously... we would need to never show those documents at the same time, because they would be contradicting. But would anything stop us from doing that so long as nobody ever saw either document at the same time?

Ultimately, the bill is dumb, no doubt, but you'll never convince Hick of that and the horse has already left the barn.

[MAP]

Where is Marble's bombshell?

Maybe an amendment?