Close
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: Just curious

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Ammocurious Rucker61's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO, USA
    Posts
    3,359

    Default

    According to a study by Newsweek magazine, only 2% of civilian shootings involve an innocent person being shot (not killed). The error rate for police is 11%. What this means is that you are more than 5 times more likely to be accidentally shot by a policeman than by an armed citizen. But, when you consider that citizens shoot and kill at least twice as many criminals as do police every year, it means that, per capita, you are more than 11 times more likely to be accidentally shot by a policeman than by an armed citizen. That is as low as I can get that number. This is not meant to be an indictment of the police. In fact, because police often live on the edge, they naturally tend to shoot first and ask questions later. Although they are trained to repress this instinct, it does not always work, as evidenced by the number of innocent people killed by police. Also, since they are generally better marksmen, they tend to kill, rather than wound or totally miss their target.
    The Kleck study shows that police shoot and kill around 600 criminals each year. Yet the University of Chicago study shows that police killed 330 innocent individuals in 1993. That means that for every two criminals killed by police, one innocent citizen is killed by police. Although I have the greatest respect for the police and how they must respond under pressure, I think that I would much rather trust an armed populace.
    Te occidere possunt sed te edere non possunt nefas est

    Sane person with a better sight picture

  2. #2
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Only one I can think of is the guy that shot up the gym he worked out at. I don't remember if he killed anyone though, and it was definitely premeditated.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  3. #3

    Default

    delete
    Last edited by robertcolorado2009; 03-08-2013 at 22:14.

  4. #4
    Zombie Slayer Aloha_Shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Posts
    6,566

    Default

    I've exceeded the speed limit while I had my gun in the car with me, does that count?

  5. #5
    Guest
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    94

    Default

    http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/rsd/chl.../convrates.htm

    The summary is that ccw holders commit crimes at a rate 1/10th that of ordinary citizens.

  6. #6
    Guest
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Castle Rock
    Posts
    3,254

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DHCO View Post
    http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/rsd/chl.../convrates.htm

    The summary is that ccw holders commit crimes at a rate 1/10th that of ordinary citizens.

    Good info right there; wish we had Colorado info like that.

  7. #7
    Machine Gunner Kraven251's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Parker
    Posts
    1,732

    Default

    I believe that the numbers in CO are low or non-existent or we would have heard all about it during the CCW on campuses debate.
    Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

    Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem. --TJ

  8. #8
    Guest
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Castle Rock
    Posts
    3,254

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kraven251 View Post
    I believe that the numbers in CO are low or non-existent or we would have heard all about it during the CCW on campuses debate.
    And because they are low (assumed) it would have been nice to hear that..............

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •