--J
My Feedback
"Praise be to our prophet, John Moses Browning, who hath bestowed upon us the new testament of shooting. Delivered unto us, his disciples, on 29 March 1911 A.D."
Go back and read the context of my statement, which was based on other people's posts before it. I'm not worried about a bullet taking out a plane by depressurization. I was merely stating that bullets would probably do more damage to other systems than they would in depressurizing the cabin.
And tell me how that fuel tank with triple redundancy is going to hold up with a dozen bullet holes in it. I'm sure some defense contractors would love to know more about this technology. How about armor piercing bullets? Or how about incendiary ammunition? Aluminum sure as hell won't stop either of them.
Who's going to check everybody's ammo before they board? So lets keep talking about letting guns on a plane
So instead you wait until you have strength in numbers?
Yeah, several bullet holes in the fuselage of a modern commercial airliner would not cause any serious problems. Cabin would depressurize, O2 masks would drop, and the plane would keep on flying. This has been tested again and again: A single, or even multiple bullet holes in a pressurized aircraft are not going to cause it to explode or tear in half like in the movies.
My Feedback
"When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law." -Frederic Bastiat
"I am a conservative. Quite possibly I am on the losing side; often I think so. Yet, out of a curious perversity I had rather lose with Socrates, let us say, than win with Lenin."
― Russell Kirk, Author of The Conservative Mind