Close
Results 1 to 10 of 203

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Say "Car RAMROD!" J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 1983
    Location
    Westminster, CO
    Posts
    4,012

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bogie View Post
    I'd be more worried about somebody hitting a fuel tank, hydraulic line, or control wire.
    Can't believe nobody replied to this, or maybe I missed it?

    Modern aircraft have backups in duplicate or triplicate on most systems. Don't think a couple of bullets will be able to take them out.
    --J
    My Feedback

    "Praise be to our prophet, John Moses Browning, who hath bestowed upon us the new testament of shooting. Delivered unto us, his disciples, on 29 March 1911 A.D."



  2. #2
    Machine Gunner
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Pueblo
    Posts
    1,927

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by J View Post
    Can't believe nobody replied to this, or maybe I missed it?

    Modern aircraft have backups in duplicate or triplicate on most systems. Don't think a couple of bullets will be able to take them out.
    I thought about that, but I'm not in the mood for a pissing match today so I kept it to myself.
    "Peace is that brief glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading."
    Thomas Jefferson

  3. #3
    Guest
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Lafayette
    Posts
    5,007
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by J View Post
    Can't believe nobody replied to this, or maybe I missed it?

    Modern aircraft have backups in duplicate or triplicate on most systems. Don't think a couple of bullets will be able to take them out.
    Go back and read the context of my statement, which was based on other people's posts before it. I'm not worried about a bullet taking out a plane by depressurization. I was merely stating that bullets would probably do more damage to other systems than they would in depressurizing the cabin.

    And tell me how that fuel tank with triple redundancy is going to hold up with a dozen bullet holes in it. I'm sure some defense contractors would love to know more about this technology. How about armor piercing bullets? Or how about incendiary ammunition? Aluminum sure as hell won't stop either of them.
    Who's going to check everybody's ammo before they board? So lets keep talking about letting guns on a plane

    Quote Originally Posted by car-15 View Post
    I thought about that, but I'm not in the mood for a pissing match today so I kept it to myself.
    So instead you wait until you have strength in numbers?

  4. #4
    Gives a sh!t; pretends he doesn't HoneyBadger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    C-Springs again! :)
    Posts
    14,803
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by J View Post
    Can't believe nobody replied to this, or maybe I missed it?

    Modern aircraft have backups in duplicate or triplicate on most systems. Don't think a couple of bullets will be able to take them out.
    Yeah, several bullet holes in the fuselage of a modern commercial airliner would not cause any serious problems. Cabin would depressurize, O2 masks would drop, and the plane would keep on flying. This has been tested again and again: A single, or even multiple bullet holes in a pressurized aircraft are not going to cause it to explode or tear in half like in the movies.
    My Feedback

    "When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law." -Frederic Bastiat

    "I am a conservative. Quite possibly I am on the losing side; often I think so. Yet, out of a curious perversity I had rather lose with Socrates, let us say, than win with Lenin."
    ― Russell Kirk, Author of The Conservative Mind

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •