Close
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Iceman sniper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Brighton
    Posts
    16,986

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cstone View Post
    Would you replace TSA? With what? What kind of security would you design for commercial aviation that would be 100% effective? 90% effective? 80% effective? Pretty good, most of the time?

    Please spare me with the Israeli methodology as it does not and can not be translated from their microscopic commercial aviation operation to domestic aviation in the USA.

    The best government is less government.

    Be safe.
    Private security just like MCO, MCI. I think SAC and ATL are also on the way to this.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/16/us...-tsa.html?_r=0

    They said in the article if just the top airports switched it would save tax payers $1 billion over 5 years. Small potatoes in the world of multi trillion dollar deficits but anything helps.

    Nothing is 100% effective, not even condoms.

    The reality is that anyone can be bought, be it a government screener or a private screener. We see on a pretty regular basis stories of people who got guns or knives or other things through security. How many more people didn't say a thing and continued on with their life. How many people including children have been needlessly patted down or essentially groped for no good.

    As bad as it is to say, we need to profile. That is the bottom line. There are lists that the multiple three letter agencies have that would give great insight as to who to check, who is connected with them, where they might fly out of etc. It would also put the focus on the higher threats, not spread it so thin the underwear and shoe bombers have a less risk of getting caught.

    Private companies, IE the airlines are getting horrendously bad reputations thanks to security. The passengers show up pre-pissed off half the time, families are scrutinized, peoples personal privacy is severely invaded.

    Now private security won't change all of this. There will still be rules and procedures to follow, but the tax payers will save major dollars, less government will be in our lives, private companies will be able to prosper and the correct amount of employees needed to complete the job will be there, not twice as many with half of them sitting around doing nothing or holding hands through the airport or watching the sporting events on the airport paid for TV.
    All I have in this world is my balls and my word and I don't break em for no one.

    My Feedback

  2. #2
    A FUN TITLE asmo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Douglas County (Parker)
    Posts
    3,446

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sniper7 View Post
    Private security just like MCO, MCI. I think SAC and ATL are also on the way to this.
    Please for the love of god don't bring back Wackenhut and all the different security companies at every different airport. The ONLY thing good that TSA has done is at least 90% of the screeners actually speak English now.
    What is my joy if all hands, even the unclean, can reach into it? What is my wisdom, if even the fools can dictate to me? What is my freedom, if all creatures, even the botched and impotent, are my masters? What is my life, if I am but to bow, to agree and to obey?
    -- Ayn Rand, Anthem (Chapter 11)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •