Confusion with the new background check law

[asmo]

And that confuses me because from what I understand don't spouses share personal property rights? Hence the mags I have are as much as mine as they are hers?

From 1224 as amended.

EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN THIS SECTION ON AND AFTER JULY 1, 2013, A PERSON WHO SELLS TRANSFERS OR POSSESSES A LARGE CAPACITY MAGAZINE COMMITS A CLASS 2 MISDEMEANOR.

Note the use of the word "person". Singular. e.g. an individual.

[muddywings]

I'm not going to over think it.

**********
I get pulled over.
Officer, "Do you have any weapons on you?"
Me, "Yes sir, here is my CCW and I'm carrying."
Officer, "Is the weapon yours."
Me "yes officer, it's mine."
Officer, "move along. move along"

Go home take off gun; wife decides she needs to run an errand and takes my gun and just slides the holster onto her belt and out she goes:
Wife gets pulled over.
Officer, "Do you have any weapons on you?"
Wife, "Yes sir, here is my CCW and I'm carrying."
Officer, "Is the weapon yours."
Wife, "yes officer, it's mine."
Officer, "move along. move along"

I heard somewhere the possession is 9/10ths the law
It's unenforceable and it's useless. It makes life more difficult in the TP but between the wife and me, ehhh...not wasting braincells on it!

[kidicarus13]

...you have now committed a Class 2 misdemeanor and will loose your rights to own guns forever.

Where did this part come from?

[asmo]

I'm not going to over think it.

Its not quite that easy for some of us. There are quite a few on this list that have to answer stupid questions every few years. Some of those questions include "Other than minor traffic issues, have you broken any laws"...

[lowbeyond]

Just say no. Yes lie to the fukking government. Who cares. You have undoubtedly broke other laws beyond traffic offenses. You just have not been charged yet

We are a nation of criminals thanks to the government and the law. It is pretty impossible to not break the law. All that is left is for you to wait your turn to be put through the grinder for laughs and money

[00tec]

Where did this part come from?

I am curious about that as well. Its not a domestic violence charge or a felony, so I would still be able to possess a firearm

[Busta Prima]

As always, we will be our own worst enemies and yes it's not even law and it's being "overthunk-ed" Just ignore it. Whomever is holding the mag owns the mag. Every mag was purchased legally. Don't consent to any searches and don't talk to any cop about it without talking to an attorney first. Pretty generic advice, really.

[4gunfun]

As always, we will be our own worst enemies and yes it's not even law and it's being "overthunk-ed" Just ignore it. Whomever is holding the mag owns the mag. Every mag was purchased legally. Don't consent to any searches and don't talk to any cop about it without talking to an attorney first. Pretty generic advice, really.

This ^^^^ It's up to the scumbags to prove who owned the mag on July 1

[Great-Kazoo]

This ^^^^ It's up to the scumbags to prove who owned the mag on July 1

I've been saying this in all my responses to hysterical post. Yet like some in the new TP Rules, they don't get it. Is this yours, yes. Move along these aren't the droids you're looking for.

[Eggysrun]

I've been saying this in all my responses to hysterical post. Yet like some in the new TP Rules, they don't get it. Is this yours, yes. Move along these aren't the droids you're looking for.

I could see a bumper sticker saying "These aren't the magazines you're looking for" lol